1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-908x.1984.tb00402.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flameless Atomic Absorption Determination of Platinum, Palladium, and Rhodium in Geologic Materials

Abstract: Platinum, palladium and rhodium have been determined in 18 U.S. Geological Survey reference materials by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry after preconcentration by the classical leadfree assay technique. A comparison with literature values shows clearly the need for additional data on these samples before “best” values can be assigned.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was possible to determine Pt in only two sample portions of DNC-1. The average value for Pt of 46 * 2 ppb (one standard deviation) is almost twice that of Aruscavage et al (18), who report 25.8 f 1.6 ppb (one standard deviation) for five determinations. Unfortunately, this low level is close to the detection limit for Pt at the 10 g sample size (22 f 27 ppb) and these determinations are relatively imprecise.…”
Section: Ir and Pt Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…It was possible to determine Pt in only two sample portions of DNC-1. The average value for Pt of 46 * 2 ppb (one standard deviation) is almost twice that of Aruscavage et al (18), who report 25.8 f 1.6 ppb (one standard deviation) for five determinations. Unfortunately, this low level is close to the detection limit for Pt at the 10 g sample size (22 f 27 ppb) and these determinations are relatively imprecise.…”
Section: Ir and Pt Resultsmentioning
confidence: 49%
“…Palladium measurement results are in agreement of the value reported by Aruscavage et al . () for both samples. Also Pd mass fraction for NOD‐P‐1 coincides with the data of Baker and Krogh Jensen ().…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Previously, for PGE and gold determination in these reference samples, the following methods were applied: flameless atomic absorption analysis after fire assay preconcentration (Chowdhury and Pal , Aruscavage et al . ), ICP‐MS analysis following NiS‐fire assay preconcentration (Balaram et al . ), ID‐ICP‐MS analyses after anion exchange PGE separation (Baker and Krogh Jensen ), sector field inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (ICP‐SF‐MS) without pre‐concentration (Axelsson et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various traditional preconcentration procedures are available, including fire assay (1,2), solvent extraction (3,4), and column ion-exchange (5,6) techniques. Determinative end-points include flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry (7)(8)(9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%