2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2019.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flange forming at an arbitrary tube location through upsetting with a controllable deformation zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the upsetting process, the moving tools are the punch and counter-punch [51], while in extrusion the punch and moveable sleeve [52]. This kinematics of the tools prevent local buckling of the hollow workpiece wall; thus, making it possible to form relatively high flanges with wall thickness larger than that of the billet [53,54]. The process of extrusion with a moveable sleeve can be conducted in several stages, which makes it possible to produce flanges that have a more than twofold higher volume than those produced using the conventional radial extrusion technique [55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the upsetting process, the moving tools are the punch and counter-punch [51], while in extrusion the punch and moveable sleeve [52]. This kinematics of the tools prevent local buckling of the hollow workpiece wall; thus, making it possible to form relatively high flanges with wall thickness larger than that of the billet [53,54]. The process of extrusion with a moveable sleeve can be conducted in several stages, which makes it possible to produce flanges that have a more than twofold higher volume than those produced using the conventional radial extrusion technique [55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the process is performed in several stages or in combination with other techniques, e.g., upsetting in the tapered die cavity, it is possible to form flanges with a large diameter and height at the same time. Zhu et al [10] proposed a process that was similar to the above-mentioned movable sleeve extrusion method. In this process, the sleeve is fixed, and the punch moves along with a counterpunch that is pressed against the face-end of the flange formed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 (10) is then defined, and the least-squares method is used to determine the coefficients a and b, thus yielding Equation (11) that is plotted as a red straight line in Figure 10. Given the above, it can be stated that the maximum incremental extrusion force for forming a flange with a given diameter can be roughly determined using the obtained equation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The process presented in the study [12] is realised with top and bottom dies simultaneously moving and creating a closed impression of a fixed height. In the works [13,14] using the movable counter punch increases the height of the closed impression, which allows one to produce a flange with relatively significant heights in relation to the wall thickness of the tube billet. In the technologies based on extrusion with a movable sleeve, moving spontaneously as a result of pressure force of the deformed material [15] or powered independently from the punch [16,17] the volume of the closed impression increases along with the stage of the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%