2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flanking Polyproline Sequences Inhibit β-Sheet Structure in Polyglutamine Segments by Inducing PPII-like Helix Structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
203
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
(123 reference statements)
12
203
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This may indicate that such a branched structure may function by serving as a steric impediment to the formation of higher order polyglutamine ␤-sheet structures. An analogous effect has been observed for flanking polyproline tracts, which can inhibit ␤-sheet structure in polyglutamine segments (76). Alternatively, SUMO modification of the SC motifs in AR may prevent proteolytic steps that are thought to be involved in the generation of toxic polyglutamine-containing fragments (77,78).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This may indicate that such a branched structure may function by serving as a steric impediment to the formation of higher order polyglutamine ␤-sheet structures. An analogous effect has been observed for flanking polyproline tracts, which can inhibit ␤-sheet structure in polyglutamine segments (76). Alternatively, SUMO modification of the SC motifs in AR may prevent proteolytic steps that are thought to be involved in the generation of toxic polyglutamine-containing fragments (77,78).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This behavior could be due to residual polyproline II structure. The highly proline-rich C terminus has been predicted (21,43,44), but not shown directly, to take up such a structure in HDx1 fibrils.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We believe that these Pro residues act as conformational stabilizers and offer improved resistance to TFE-induced folding. 39,40 This resistance to folding may play a role in the function of the PPII containing central domain within rP172, such as the participation in intermolecular contacts that lead to self-assembly at appropriate protein concentrations, or, facilitate the folding and/or stabilization of the adjacent N-and Ctermini. 9,39,40,45 The second group of Pro residues are a limited subset (P2, P127, P130, P139, P154, P157, P162), which exhibit significant conformational sensitivity to TFE (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 However, given that only limited regions within these two PPII domains experience TFE-induced folding transitions, it is clear that the majority of these Pro, Gln rich regions within the central domain are resistant to TFE ''solvent engineering,'' most likely as a result of the strong stabilization features of these sequences. 39,40 Conformational response of Pro residues It is known from earlier studies that TFE affects Pro imido ring dynamics, conformation, and cis trans interconversion. 28,29,33,38 Since amelogenins contain a significant number of Pro residues (e.g., rP172 ¼ 40 Pro, or 23% of the total sequence, Fig.…”
Section: Localization Of Folding Within Rp172mentioning
confidence: 99%