2003
DOI: 10.1117/12.480257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flat-panel detector-based cone beam volume CT breast imaging: detector evaluation

Abstract: Preliminary evaluation of large-area flat panel detectors (FPDs) indicates that FPDs have some potential advantages over film-screen and CCD-based imagers: compactness, high resolution, high frame rate, large dynamic range, small image lag (<1%), and excellent linearity (~1%). A real time large-area flat panel detector (FPD) Varian PaxScan 2520 was evaluated for cone-beam volume breast imaging (CBVCTBI) in terms of dynamic range, linearity, image lag, and spatial as well as low contrast resolution. In additio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specificity and the positive predictive value of mammography remain limited owing to an overlap in the appearances of benign and malignant lesions, and surrounding structure. We propose to address the limitations accompanying conventional mammography by incorporating a cone beam CT reconstruction technique with a recently developed flat panel detector (FPD) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. With this technique, threedimensional (3D) reconstructions of a breast from a single fast volume scan (5-10 seconds) can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity and the positive predictive value of mammography remain limited owing to an overlap in the appearances of benign and malignant lesions, and surrounding structure. We propose to address the limitations accompanying conventional mammography by incorporating a cone beam CT reconstruction technique with a recently developed flat panel detector (FPD) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. With this technique, threedimensional (3D) reconstructions of a breast from a single fast volume scan (5-10 seconds) can be obtained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specificity and the positive predictive value of mammography remain limited owing to an overlap in the appearances of benign and malignant lesions, and surrounding structure. We propose to address the limitations accompanying conventional mammography by incorporating a cone beam CT reconstruction technique with a recently developed flat panel detector (FPD) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. A conceptual design of the proposed FPD-based cone beam computed tomography breast imaging (CBCTBI) system is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to then-immature CT technology, long scanning time, relatively low spatial resolution, and sub-optimal detector and x-ray technique used, it was not conclusive from the results of those studies that the fan beam CT mammography of that time was superior to the contemporary conventional mammography [11][12]. A group presented the concept of a dedicated fan beam CT for breast imaging [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%