2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00208-015-1228-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flattening of CR singular points and analyticity of the local hull of holomorphy I

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem is closely related to the complex Plateau problem and the problem describing the local hull of holomorphy for a real submanifold in a complex space. In [HY3], we showed that when there is at least one elliptic direction for a CR singular point in a codimension two real analytic submanifold M , it can always be holomorphically flattened near p and bound a Levi-flat hypersurface serving as the local hull of holomorphy of the manifold M near p. In this article, we will show that even if there is no elliptic direction, whenever not all Bishop invariants are parabolic, the manifold M can be formally flattened. Of course, this is all we might expect due to examples by Moser-Webster [MW] even in the C 2 setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The problem is closely related to the complex Plateau problem and the problem describing the local hull of holomorphy for a real submanifold in a complex space. In [HY3], we showed that when there is at least one elliptic direction for a CR singular point in a codimension two real analytic submanifold M , it can always be holomorphically flattened near p and bound a Levi-flat hypersurface serving as the local hull of holomorphy of the manifold M near p. In this article, we will show that even if there is no elliptic direction, whenever not all Bishop invariants are parabolic, the manifold M can be formally flattened. Of course, this is all we might expect due to examples by Moser-Webster [MW] even in the C 2 setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The general holomorphic (or, formal) flattening problem is then to ask when M can be transformed, by a biholomorphic (formal equivalence, respectively) mapping, to an open piece of the standard Levi-flat hyperplane (C n × R 1 ) × {0} ⊂ C n+1 . While the holomorphic flattening requires certain convexity (ellipticity) as in [HY3], the formal flattening can be done in a much more general setting as we will see in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The local structure up to quadratic part in dimension n = 2 has been studied by Coffman [5], and up to isotopy by the author in [19]. For n > 1, some normal forms have been obtained recently by Yin and Huang in [14,15] and Burcea [2]. The analogous cancellation theorem to the one for n = 1 was proved in [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Our paper takes up a very classical problem with a new tool, and gives a formal normal form for Levi-nondegenerat real analytic manifolds which under a rather simple condition (see (85)) can be shown to be convergent. Recent advances in normal forms for real submanifolds of complex spaces with respect to holomorphic transformations have been significant: We would like to cite in this context the recent works of Huang and Yin [HY09, HY16,HY17], the second author and Gong [GS16], and Gong and Lebl [GL15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%