2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.103991
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flavour component analysis by HS-SPME/GC–MS and chemometric modeling to characterize Pilsner-style Lager craft beers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Micro-bbs employ different types of raw materials, for instance hop pellets, which when comparing with macro-bbs that use hop extracts, will influence the content of this analyte and may support this variation. A similar result was previously reported when comparing the linalool content between craft and industrial beers, it being higher for the first ones [45].…”
Section: Lager Beer Typingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Micro-bbs employ different types of raw materials, for instance hop pellets, which when comparing with macro-bbs that use hop extracts, will influence the content of this analyte and may support this variation. A similar result was previously reported when comparing the linalool content between craft and industrial beers, it being higher for the first ones [45].…”
Section: Lager Beer Typingsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Other authors quantified 19 volatile compounds in beers employing HS-SPME, with 30 minutes of extraction [25]. Giannetti et al [26] performed SPME extractions of 10 minutes, but no quantification was carried out.…”
Section: Analytical Validation Of the Optimised Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within chemometric approaches, classification techniques aim to recognize patterns in data and sort observations into categories. Pattern recognition methods have been widely applied in beer science to discriminate among: geographical origin (Alcazar et al, 2012;Li et al, 2007;Tan et al, 2015), brand authenticity (Cajka et al, 2010;Di Egidio et al, 2011;Soares et al, 2017), beer style, and ingredients (Duarte et al, 2004;Giannetti, Mariani, Torrelli, & Marini, 2019;Perez-Rafols and Saurina, 2015). Furthermore, many classification methods have been used for discrimination between fresh and aged beer (Table 2).…”
Section: Classification Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%