2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flavour profiling of ‘Marion’ and thornless blackberries by instrumental and sensory analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The volatile aroma compounds found in whiteberry and blackberry (Table 2) can be grouped into six chemical groups: aldehydes, esters, alcohols, furanone, sulfide compounds, and terpenes. These results are in similar with most of the results obtained in other studies (Du, Kurnianta, McDaniel, Finn, & Qian, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The volatile aroma compounds found in whiteberry and blackberry (Table 2) can be grouped into six chemical groups: aldehydes, esters, alcohols, furanone, sulfide compounds, and terpenes. These results are in similar with most of the results obtained in other studies (Du, Kurnianta, McDaniel, Finn, & Qian, 2010).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Fruit analysis. Fruit samples were prepared using methods adapted from Du et al (2010). Fruit were frozen and stored at -18°C until sample preparation, when they were thawed in a refrigerator overnight.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to limited quantities of berries from the 2012 harvest, sensory analysis was performed on berries from the 2013 harvest. Since “Black Diamond” is a more recently developed and less studied cultivar than “Marion,” it was chosen as the cultivar of study (Finn and others ; Du and others ). To prepare samples for evaluation, berries were first removed from frozen storage and allowed to thaw under refrigeration (4 ± 1 °C) for 48 h. Each of the 9 weed management/harvest time combinations were assigned 3 randomly generated 3‐digit codes (to obscure the existence of replications from panelists) before being pureed individually using a blender (Waring Laboratory Science, Torrington, Conn., U.S.A.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%