Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Chemical group 2 consists of branched‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing branched‐chain alcohols and acetals containing branched‐chain aldehydes, of which 34 are currently authorised for use as flavours in food. The use of 2‐methylpropionic acid, isopentyl acetate, 3‐methylbutyl butyrate and 2‐methylbutyl acetate is safe at the proposed use level of 25 mg/kg complete feed for cattle, salmonids and non food producing animals and at 5 mg/kg complete feed for pigs and poultry. 2‐Methylpropan‐1‐ol, isopentanol, 2‐ethylhexan‐1‐ol, 2‐methylpropanal, 3‐methylbutanal, 2‐methylbutyraldehyde, 3‐methylbutyric acid, 2‐methylvaleric acid, 2‐ethylbutyric acid, 2‐methylbutyric acid, 2‐methylheptanoic acid, 4‐methyloctanoic acid, isobutyl acetate, isobutyl butyrate, 3‐methylbutyl propionate, 3‐methylbutyl formate, glyceryl tributyrate, isobutyl isobutyrate, isopentyl isobutyrate, isobutyl isovalerate, isopentyl 2‐methylbutyrate, 2‐methylbutyl isovalerate and 2‐methylbutyl butyrate are safe at the proposed use level of 5 mg/kg complete feed for all animal species. 3,7‐Dimethyloctan‐1‐ol, 2‐methylundecanal, 4‐methylnonanoic acid, 3‐methylbutyl hexanoate, 3‐methylbutyl dodecanoate, 3‐methylbutyl octanoate and 3‐methylbutyl 3‐methylbutyrate are safe at a maximum of 1.5 mg/kg complete feed for cattle, salmonids and non food‐producing animals and of 1.0 mg/kg complete feed for pigs and poultry. No safety concern was identified for the consumer from the use of these compounds up to the highest safe level in feedingstuffs for all animal species. All compounds should be considered as irritants to skin, eyes and respiratory tract, and as skin sensitisers. The compounds do not pose a risk to the environment when used at concentrations considered safe for the target species. Since all compounds are used in food as flavourings, no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary.
Chemical group 2 consists of branched‐chain primary aliphatic alcohols/aldehydes/acids, acetals and esters with esters containing branched‐chain alcohols and acetals containing branched‐chain aldehydes, of which 34 are currently authorised for use as flavours in food. The use of 2‐methylpropionic acid, isopentyl acetate, 3‐methylbutyl butyrate and 2‐methylbutyl acetate is safe at the proposed use level of 25 mg/kg complete feed for cattle, salmonids and non food producing animals and at 5 mg/kg complete feed for pigs and poultry. 2‐Methylpropan‐1‐ol, isopentanol, 2‐ethylhexan‐1‐ol, 2‐methylpropanal, 3‐methylbutanal, 2‐methylbutyraldehyde, 3‐methylbutyric acid, 2‐methylvaleric acid, 2‐ethylbutyric acid, 2‐methylbutyric acid, 2‐methylheptanoic acid, 4‐methyloctanoic acid, isobutyl acetate, isobutyl butyrate, 3‐methylbutyl propionate, 3‐methylbutyl formate, glyceryl tributyrate, isobutyl isobutyrate, isopentyl isobutyrate, isobutyl isovalerate, isopentyl 2‐methylbutyrate, 2‐methylbutyl isovalerate and 2‐methylbutyl butyrate are safe at the proposed use level of 5 mg/kg complete feed for all animal species. 3,7‐Dimethyloctan‐1‐ol, 2‐methylundecanal, 4‐methylnonanoic acid, 3‐methylbutyl hexanoate, 3‐methylbutyl dodecanoate, 3‐methylbutyl octanoate and 3‐methylbutyl 3‐methylbutyrate are safe at a maximum of 1.5 mg/kg complete feed for cattle, salmonids and non food‐producing animals and of 1.0 mg/kg complete feed for pigs and poultry. No safety concern was identified for the consumer from the use of these compounds up to the highest safe level in feedingstuffs for all animal species. All compounds should be considered as irritants to skin, eyes and respiratory tract, and as skin sensitisers. The compounds do not pose a risk to the environment when used at concentrations considered safe for the target species. Since all compounds are used in food as flavourings, no further demonstration of efficacy is necessary.
The Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate 56 flavouring substances in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 6, Revision 4, using the Procedure in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. This revision is made due to the inclusion of six additional flavouring substances, (-)-3,7-dimethyl-6-octen-1-ol .229], dec-4(cis)-enal .137], neral .170], trans-3,7-dimethylocta-2,6-dienal (geranial) .188], trans-3-hexenyl formate .562] and cis-3-hexenyl 2-methylbutanoate ]. None of the substances were considered to have genotoxic potential. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach (the Procedure) that integrates information on structure-activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel concluded that the 56 substances 02.138, 02.152, 02.170, 02.175, 02.176, 02.195, 02.201, 02.222, 02.229, 02.234, 05.061, 05.082, 05.137, 05.143, 05.170, 05.174, 05.188, 05.203, 05.217, 05.218, 05.220, 05.226, 08.074, 08.100, 08.102, 09.341, 09.368, 09.377, 09.562, 09.567, 09.569, 09.572, 09.575, 09.612, 09.638, 09.640, 09.643, 09.672, 09.673, 09.674, 09.831, 09.838, 09.854, 09.855, 09.871, 09.872, 09.884, 09.885, 09.897, 09.898, 09.928, 09.937, 09.938, 09.939 and 09.950] do not give rise to safety concern at their levels of dietary intake, estimated on the basis of the MSDI approach. Besides the safety assessment of these flavouring substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been considered. Adequate specifications including complete purity criteria and identity for the materials of commerce have been provided for all 56 Forty-one of the flavouring substances in the present group have been reported to occur naturally in a wide range of food items.In its evaluation, the Panel as a default used the "Maximised Survey-derived Daily Intake" (MSDI) approach to estimate the per capita intakes of the flavouring substances in Europe. However, when the Panel examined the information provided by the European Flavour Industry on the use levels in various foods, it appeared obvious that the MSDI approach in a number of cases would grossly underestimate the intake by regular consumers of products flavoured at the use level reported by the Industry, especially in those cases where the annual production values were reported to be small. In consequence, the Panel had reservations about the data on use and use levels provided and the intake estimates obtained by the MSDI approach.In the absence of more precise information that would enable the Panel to make a more realistic estimate of the intakes of the flavouring substances, the Panel has decided also to perform an estimate of the daily intakes per person using a "modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake" (mTAMDI) approach based on the normal use levels reported by Industry. In those cases where the mTAMDI approach indicated that the intake of a flavouring subs...
The Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids of the European Food Safety Authority was requested to evaluate 21 flavouring substances in the Flavouring Group Evaluation 23, Revision 4, using the Procedure in Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000. This revision is made due to the inclusion of one additional flavouring substance, 2S-cis-tetrahydro-4-methyl-2-(2-methyl-1-propenyl)-2H-pyran ]. None of the substances were considered to have genotoxic potential. The substances were evaluated through a stepwise approach (the Procedure) that integrates information on structure-activity relationships, intake from current uses, toxicological threshold of concern, and available data on metabolism and toxicity. The Panel concluded that all 21 substances 02.248, 03.008, 03.011, 03.012, 03.015, 03.016, 03.020, 03.022, 03.024, 04.059, 04.067, 04.068, 04.069, 04.075, 04.079, 04.084, 08.127, 09.687, 13.170 and 13.200] do not give rise to safety concerns at their levels of dietary intake, estimated on the basis of the MSDI approach. Besides the safety assessment of these flavouring substances, the specifications for the materials of commerce have also been considered. Specifications including complete purity criteria and identity for the materials of commerce have been provided for all 21 candidate substances. © European Food Safety Authority, 2013. Two of the flavouring substances are classified into structural class I, seven are classified into structural class II and 12 are classified into structural class III according to the decision tree approach presented by Cramer et al. KEY WORDSEleven of the substances in the present group have been reported to occur naturally in a wide range of food items.In its evaluation, the Panel as a default used the "Maximised Survey-derived Daily Intake" (MSDI) approach to estimate the per capita intakes of the flavouring substances in Europe. However, when the Panel examined the information provided by the European Flavour Industry on the use levels in various foods, it appeared obvious that the MSDI approach in a number of cases would grossly underestimate the intake by regular consumers of products flavoured at the use level reported by the Industry, especially in those cases where the annual production values were reported to be small. In consequence, the Panel had reservations about the data on use and use levels provided and the intake estimates obtained by the MSDI approach.In the absence of more precise information that would enable the Panel to make a more realistic estimate of the intakes of the flavouring substances, the Panel has decided also to perform an estimate of the daily intakes per person using a "modified Theoretical Added Maximum Daily Intake" (mTAMDI) approach based on the normal use levels reported by Industry. In those cases where the mTAMDI approach indicated that the intake of a flavouring substance might exceed its corresponding threshold of concern, the Panel decided not to carry out a formal safety assessment using the P...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.