1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0737-6782(98)00049-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility and standardization: test of a contingency model of product design–manufacturing integration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
69
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another significant stream of research addresses team capabilities and their influence on performance (see Dahl, ). Organizational and technical practices, such as cross‐functional teams and colocation, are effective for increasing new design integration with other areas (Datar et al., ; Liker, Collins, and Hull, ; Veryzer and de Mozota, ) and subsequent commercial success (Ettlie, ), even across cultures (Souder and Jenssen, ). Adding new team members increases product enhancements at a faster pace than more intense use of process technology, but increases the need for repairs at almost the same rate as enhancements (Barry, Kemerer, and Slaughter, ).…”
Section: Product Design Context and Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another significant stream of research addresses team capabilities and their influence on performance (see Dahl, ). Organizational and technical practices, such as cross‐functional teams and colocation, are effective for increasing new design integration with other areas (Datar et al., ; Liker, Collins, and Hull, ; Veryzer and de Mozota, ) and subsequent commercial success (Ettlie, ), even across cultures (Souder and Jenssen, ). Adding new team members increases product enhancements at a faster pace than more intense use of process technology, but increases the need for repairs at almost the same rate as enhancements (Barry, Kemerer, and Slaughter, ).…”
Section: Product Design Context and Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rise of these cross-functional teams has been influenced by the need for firms to increase their learning capabilities and improve critical information sharing across functional boundaries (Narver and Slater 1990). Researchers (Droge, Jayaram, and Vickery 2000;Hartley, Zirger, and Kamath 1997;Liker, Collins, and Hull 1999) found that cross-functional teams tend to reduce product development time and improve new product performance. Executives in business-to-business firms rate the sales force as the most important source of information for new product development (Cross et al 2001), supporting their involvement in product modification efforts.…”
Section: The Impact Of Sales Force Involvement In Product Modificatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies based on surveys focus on explaining the antecedents and consequences of the use of DFM/A or DFX (Kessler, 2000;Liker, Collins, & Hull, 1999;Marion & Meyer, 2011;Rusinko, 1999;Swink & Nair, 2007). One study with a similar objective is based on archival data of a limited number of cases (Wang & Trolio, 2001).…”
Section: Design For Manufacturing/assembly (Dfm/dfa) and Design For Xmentioning
confidence: 99%