2011
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility in Faculty Work-Life Policies at Medical Schools in the Big Ten Conference

Abstract: Purpose: Women lag behind men in several key academic indicators, such as advancement, retention, and securing leadership positions. Although reasons for these disparities are multifactorial, policies that do not support work-life integration contribute to the problem. The objective of this descriptive study was to compare the faculty work-life policies among medical schools in the Big Ten conference. Methods: Each institution's website was accessed in order to assess its work-life policies in the following ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 Additionally, a core group of residents and faculty established dedicated lactation space in the emergency departments at 2 hospitals. Actively nominating women for awards has resulted in 2 departmental, 2 institutional, and 1 national award for female faculty and residents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Additionally, a core group of residents and faculty established dedicated lactation space in the emergency departments at 2 hospitals. Actively nominating women for awards has resulted in 2 departmental, 2 institutional, and 1 national award for female faculty and residents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has identified several drivers of sex differences in academic rank in medicine, including asymmetric home and childcare responsibilities between men and women, 21,22 lack of effective mentorship and role models for women, 23–25 lack of institutional support—particularly for early career female researchers 5 —inconsistent offering of alternative, and part-time tenure tracks for non-researchers, 26–29 sex bias favoring men in the NIH award application review process generally, and for RO1 awards and repeat funding in particular, 17,18 attrition of female academics at higher levels in the academic hierarchy, 30 overt sex discrimination, and unconscious sex bias. 8,12,13,25,30 Female cardiologists report having to contend with many of these challenges.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, different promotion practices and criteria across medical schools—including variations in the types of tenure tracks offered, 27,28 thresholds for promotion, 29,34 work life balance and part-time tenure-track policies, 21,35 and the length of probationary periods prior to achieving a tenure-track position, 26 may influence male and female academic cardiologists differently. For example, there exists significant heterogeneity across medical schools in the presence and design of clinician educator tracks (CET) and in the eligibility of physicians on CET tracks for tenure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing faculty with opportunities to disengage clinically and spend time with loved ones when needed without suffering consequences, including “stop‐the‐clock policies” for tenure and promotion, would enhance work–life integration. Additionally, allowing faculty increased control over their schedules, establishing a culture of teamwork and positive relationships, and conducting periodic wellness assessments with reflective adjustments can also help combat burnout …”
Section: Retention Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%