2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.limno.2013.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexibility in feeding periodicity of a grazing mayfly in response to different concentrations of benthivorous fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, scraping mayflies typically reduce foraging activities in the presences of predatory fishes (e.g. McIntosh & Townsend, 1995;Schneider et al, 2014), so the removal of predatory fishes may have promoted grazing by scrapers, which in turn could have limited any increase in algal biomass in the fish-free pools where all macroconsumers had been removed. Nor could we detect any change in leaf-litter breakdown rates.…”
Section: Top-down Control By Macroconsumers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, scraping mayflies typically reduce foraging activities in the presences of predatory fishes (e.g. McIntosh & Townsend, 1995;Schneider et al, 2014), so the removal of predatory fishes may have promoted grazing by scrapers, which in turn could have limited any increase in algal biomass in the fish-free pools where all macroconsumers had been removed. Nor could we detect any change in leaf-litter breakdown rates.…”
Section: Top-down Control By Macroconsumers?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used concentration as a proxy for group size, following previous work (Schneider et al, 2014), although the effect of group size on odour plumes is more complex. When individuals group together, they produce a greater number of odour filaments (Monismith et al, 1990; Wilson & Weissburg, 2012) that cover a wider area (Webster & Weissburg, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the risk of predation increases too much with group size, aggregation would be counterproductive in species that cannot otherwise defend themselves. Here, we explore this question from the perspective of three-spine sticklebacks ( Gasterosteus aculeatus ) locating odour sources of differing concentration (as a proxy for prey group size (Hill & Weissburg, 2014; Schneider et al, 2014)—but see discussion) in flowing water, to test the hypothesis that increasing prey (bloodworm) cue concentration increases the risk to prey in flowing water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also clear that chemical cues from predators affect foraging behavior and trophic relationships (Abrams, 1983;Juliano & Gravel, 2002;Koch et al, 2007;Camacho & Thacker, 2013;Naddafi & Rudstam, 2013;Schneider et al, 2014). The idea that defensive compounds can affect community organization, trophic webs, and biogeochemical processes has been proposed (McClintock & Baker, 2001;Pohnert et al, 2007;Hay, 2009), and in marine Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macroinvertebrates have demonstrated vast behavioral responses to predator chemical cues (Burks & Lodge, 2002;Dodson et al, 1994), whereby the indirect effects of these compounds elicit decreased browsing, foraging, and reproductive activity (Juliano & Gravel, 2002;Koch et al, 2007;Schneider et al, 2014), reduced predatory behavior (Wisenden et al, 1997), altered habitat use (Camacho & Thacker, 2013), and increased attachment strength to substrates and aggregation rate (Naddafi & Rudstam, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%