Flexibility or Constraint? The Implications of Mothers’ and Fathers’ Nonstandard Schedules for Children’s Behavioral Outcomes

Abstract

Approximately 17.7% of the U.S. workforce is employed in a nonstandard schedule. Research thus far indicates that these schedules negatively influence children’s behavioral development. However, few studies examine the roles of the child’s gender and age. To broaden understanding of the relationships between nonstandard schedules and child behavior, and how these relationships may depend on the gender and age of the child, I analyze data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth-1979 and its Child Supplement from 1992 to 2006. My findings show that some types of parental nonstandard shifts, such as evening and night shifts, are associated with fewer behavioral problems among children, though these results depend on the gender and age of the child. In contrast, parents’ rotating and split shifts are associated with more behavior problems among children, indicating that it is relatively unstable and unpredictable work schedules that may have the most harmful associations with children’s outcomes.

Working 9‐to‐5? A review of research on nonstandard work schedules

“…Relatedly, children generally seem to experience more negative outcomes when their parents work nonstandard hours. For example, child cognitive development (Baker, 2016), school performance (Han & Fox, 2011), obesity (Ettinger, Riley, & Price, 2018; Miller & Chang, 2015), and negative behaviors such as drinking, smoking, and delinquency (Hendrix & Parcel, 2014; Kim, Ali, & Kim, 2016; Leibbrand, 2018) have all been found to be influenced by parent nonstandard work arrangements.…”