2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.12.31.521782
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible and scalable control of T cell memory by a reversible epigenetic switch

Abstract: The immune system encodes information about the severity of a pathogenic threat in the quantity and type of memory cell populations formed in response. This encoding emerges from the decisions of lymphocytes to maintain or lose self-renewal and memory potential during a challenge. By tracking CD8 T cells at the single-cell and clonal level using time-resolved transcriptomics and quantitative imaging, we identify a flexible memory strategy, whereby T cells initially choose whether to maintain or lose memory pot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since LMR consists of lymphocyte and monocyte counts, it has the advantage of being relatively inexpensive and can be obtained routinely. A low lymphocyte count indicates a persistent, relatively deficient immune state, and a high monocyte count indicates a nonspecific or systemic inflammatory state (19)(20)(21)(22). As a composite parameter reflecting two opposing immune and inflammatory pathways, LMR is more predictive than lymphocyte or monocyte alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since LMR consists of lymphocyte and monocyte counts, it has the advantage of being relatively inexpensive and can be obtained routinely. A low lymphocyte count indicates a persistent, relatively deficient immune state, and a high monocyte count indicates a nonspecific or systemic inflammatory state (19)(20)(21)(22). As a composite parameter reflecting two opposing immune and inflammatory pathways, LMR is more predictive than lymphocyte or monocyte alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The activation timing of genes is often assumed to depend solely on the activity of upstream trans -factors. However, across a range of systems, epigenetic switches, acting in cis at individual gene loci, can delay the activation of lineage-specifying genes after initial exposure to developmental signals (Abadie et al, 2023; Berry et al, 2017; Bintu et al, 2016; Hathaway et al, 2012; Ng et al, 2018), sometimes by multiple days and cell generations. These time delays in epigenetic switching vary both between single cells and between individual gene loci in the same cell due to the stochastic nature of chromatin regulation (Bintu et al, 2016; Dodd et al, 2007; Festenstein et al, 1996; Owen et al, 2023) However, despite this stochasticity, probabilistic time constants of switching are precisely modulated at multiple levels, including by cytokine signaling, transcription factors (TFs), and associated cis -regulatory elements and chromatin-modifying enzymes (Chu et al, 2021; Deschamps and Duboule, 2017; Fabre et al, 2015; Kissiov et al, 2022; Pease et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%