2012
DOI: 10.1198/jbes.2011.09053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible Approximation of Subjective Expectations Using Probability Questions

Abstract: We use spline interpolation to approximate the subjective cumulative distribution function of an economic agent over the future realization of a continuous (possibly censored) random variable. The method proposed exploits information collected using a small number of probability questions on expectations and requires a weak prior knowledge of the shape of the underlying distribution. We find that eliciting 4 or 5 points on the cumulative distribution function of an agent is sufficient to accurately approximate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following Bellemare et al (2012) and De Bresser and van Soest (2015), these six points are used to nonparametrically estimate the complete subjective distribution of the future RIRR for each observation. The distribution function is obtained by linking the six points corresponding to the reported probabilities using splines, imposing monotonicity.…”
Section: Retirement Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Bellemare et al (2012) and De Bresser and van Soest (2015), these six points are used to nonparametrically estimate the complete subjective distribution of the future RIRR for each observation. The distribution function is obtained by linking the six points corresponding to the reported probabilities using splines, imposing monotonicity.…”
Section: Retirement Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, if these Q 1 do not indicate a lack of knowledge of the stock market as "don't know" and answers identified as uninformative, they reflect at least a clearly imprecise knowledge of the stock market. The analysis will 13 Instead of assuming a normal distribution to fit each respondent-specific distribution, it would have been possible to use a more flexible method proposed recently by Bellemare, Bissonnette, and Kröger (2012) which maintains much weaker assumptions on the shape of each underlying distribution. This approach is, however, beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Analyzing the Cross-sectional Distribution Of ( ) Conditiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our second approach, adapted from Bellemare et al . (), uses spline interpolation to fit a subjective distribution that passes through the points corresponding to the probabilities reported by the respondents. This procedure is non‐parametric, in the sense that it does not assume any parametric form of the underlying distribution .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first, proposed in Dominitz and Manski (1997), fits an assumed underlying (log-normal) distribution for each observation by minimizing the squared difference between the probabilities implied by the assumed distribution and those reported in the data. Our second approach, adapted from Bellemare et al (2012), uses spline interpolation to fit a subjective distribution that passes through the points corresponding to the probabilities reported by the respondents. This procedure is non-parametric, in the sense that it does not assume any parametric form of the underlying distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%