2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible array coil for cervical and extraspinal (FACE) MRI at 3.0 Tesla

Frederik Abel,
Ek T Tan,
Martijn Lunenburg
et al.

Abstract: Objective. High-resolution MRI of the cervical spine (c-spine) and extraspinal neck region requires close-fitting receiver coils to maximize the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Conventional, rigid C-spine receiver coils do not adequately contour to the neck to accommodate varying body shapes, resulting in suboptimal SNR. Recent innovations in flexible surface coil array designs may provide three-dimensional (3D) bendability and conformability to optimize SNR, while improving capabilities for higher acceleration f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the small size of mice, flexible coils cannot couple well with them in MR imaging, resulting in a large gap that leads to poor imaging quality [ 22 ]. However, the novel micro-coil can structurally couple well with mice, minimizing surrounding gaps and increasing the filling factor [ 23 ], thus enabling better imaging of small mice. Additionally, for small animals (such as mice), in vivo imaging in a clinical 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner is technically challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the small size of mice, flexible coils cannot couple well with them in MR imaging, resulting in a large gap that leads to poor imaging quality [ 22 ]. However, the novel micro-coil can structurally couple well with mice, minimizing surrounding gaps and increasing the filling factor [ 23 ], thus enabling better imaging of small mice. Additionally, for small animals (such as mice), in vivo imaging in a clinical 3.0 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner is technically challenging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%