2020
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-020-06838-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible comparative genomics of prokaryotic transcriptional regulatory networks

Abstract: Background Comparative genomics methods enable the reconstruction of bacterial regulatory networks using available experimental data. In spite of their potential for accelerating research into the composition and evolution of bacterial regulons, few comparative genomics suites have been developed for the automated analysis of these regulatory systems. Available solutions typically rely on precomputed databases for operon and ortholog predictions, limiting the scope of analyses to processed comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The conserved elements of this putative network also encompass the SplB radical SAM protein involved in DNA repair (COG1533), which has been shown to be SOS regulated in several species ( 57 , 7 , 10 ), as well as a two-gene operon encoding a putative DNA base excision repair system (COG1573-COG4277) involving a uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) ( 7 ). Other putative members of the inferred regulatory network include a umuDC operon (COG0389-COG1974) ( 40 ) and a SOS-response associated peptidase (COG2135) regulated by LexA in the Balneolaeota ( 10 , 58 ). Evidence of regulation for other genes encoding canonical SOS proteins ( 3 ), such as RecA (COG0468) and the mismatch repair enzymes UvrC (excinuclease; COG0322) and UvrD (helicase; COG0210) is also found in several species ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The conserved elements of this putative network also encompass the SplB radical SAM protein involved in DNA repair (COG1533), which has been shown to be SOS regulated in several species ( 57 , 7 , 10 ), as well as a two-gene operon encoding a putative DNA base excision repair system (COG1573-COG4277) involving a uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) ( 7 ). Other putative members of the inferred regulatory network include a umuDC operon (COG0389-COG1974) ( 40 ) and a SOS-response associated peptidase (COG2135) regulated by LexA in the Balneolaeota ( 10 , 58 ). Evidence of regulation for other genes encoding canonical SOS proteins ( 3 ), such as RecA (COG0468) and the mismatch repair enzymes UvrC (excinuclease; COG0322) and UvrD (helicase; COG0210) is also found in several species ( Supplementary Figure S3 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparative analyses have established that error-prone polymerases constitute the conserved core SOS response across bacteria, presumably due to the need to mitigate the high mutagenic load of unregulated error-prone polymerases ( 1 , 10 , 15 ). Leveraging this insight, we performed a systematic comparative analysis of error-prone polymerase regulation in the Bacteroidetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations