Flexible fault tolerance in cloud through replicated cooperative resource group

Hasan, Moin; Goraya, Major Singh

doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2019.06.005

Cited by 14 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The individual group consists of 2f+1 replicas and handles f byzantine faults. Hasan and Goraya 43 proposed a flexible fault‐tolerance framework using a replication approach and checkpointing as a subsidiary in cloud computing systems. The algorithm categorizes tasks as delay‐sensitive with a specific deadline and delay insensitive with no deadline constraints.…”

Section: Taxonomy Of Fault Tolerance Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fault‐tolerance approaches for distributed and cloud computing environments: A systematic review, taxonomy and future directions

Kirti,

Maurya,

Yadav

2024

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Fault tolerance is crucial in ensuring smooth working of distributed and cloud computing. It is challenging to implement because of the constantly changing infrastructure and complex configurations in distributed and cloud computing. Implementation of various fault tolerance methods require domain‐specific knowledge as well as in‐depth understanding of the existing techniques and approaches. Recent surveys on fault tolerance in cloud and distributed environments exist, but they have limitations. This article systematically reviews fault tolerance approaches in distributed and cloud computing and discusses their taxonomy. Based on the taxonomy provided, fault‐tolerance approaches are divided into four types, that is, reactive approaches, proactive approaches, adaptive approaches, and hybrid approaches. Reactive approaches provide a preventive measure after the occurrence of faults in the system. Proactive approaches prevent the system or minimize failure effects by predicting in advance. The adaptive approaches predict, learn, and adapt the changes to deal with new faults in the system. The hybrid approaches combine reactive, proactive, and adaptive approaches. The objective of this article is to give a better understanding of handling faults using suitable approaches and further compare them on various parameters. The paper also presents a promising research direction based on the challenges and issues in multiple approaches.

show abstract

Section: Taxonomy Of Fault Tolerance Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fault‐tolerance approaches for distributed and cloud computing environments: A systematic review, taxonomy and future directions

Kirti,

Maurya,

Yadav

2024

Concurrency and Computation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Hasan and Goraya [24] proposed a flexible cloud fault tolerance model (FFTF). FFTF framework provides users with a key to their jobs to activate the suitable degree of fault tolerance (FT).…”

Section: H Reactive Fault Tolerance Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cloud Dynamic Load Balancing and Reactive Fault Tolerance Techniques: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR)

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The computational cloud aims to move traditional computing from personal computers to cloud providers on the internet. Cloud security represents an important research area. Confidentiality, integrity, and availability are the main cloud security characteristics addressed. Cloud providers apply dynamic load balancing and reactive fault tolerance techniques to build secure cloud services to achieve high service availability. Dynamic cloud load balancing approaches distribute submitted tasks to virtual machines during tasks execution and the load of virtual machines is updated based on the system's state. Reactive cloud fault tolerance is activated for system process failures after failure effectively happens. Reactive cloud fault tolerance handles failure after the fault has occurred. Despite the significance of dynamic load balancing and reactive fault tolerance techniques and mechanisms, few reviews focus on these approaches in a systematic, unbiased method focusing on integrating cloud dynamic load balancing and reactive fault tolerance techniques. This paper conducts a systematic literature review of the existing literature concerning reactive fault tolerance, dynamic load balancing, and their integration in their basic approaches, types, frameworks, and future directions.

show abstract

“…This paper could present an improved recovery process. Hasan and Goraya in [20] worked on a trade‐off between performance and cost in the Cloud. Their method as the flexible fault‐tolerance framework (FFTF) could improve the deadline guarantee ratio and average task delay.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%