2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.05.442653
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible neural control of motor units

Abstract: SummaryVoluntary movement requires communication from cortex to the spinal cord, where a dedicated pool of motor units (MUs) activates each muscle. The canonical description of MU function, established decades ago, rests upon two foundational tenets. First, cortex cannot control MUs independently1 but supplies each pool with a common drive that specifies force amplitude2,3. Second, as force rises, MUs are recruited in a consistent order4–13 typically described by Henneman’s size principle14–19. While this para… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
(291 reference statements)
4
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This model fits the data much more closely than previous dynamical systems models. These findings also agree with previous suggestions that motor cortex is higher dimensional than previously thought 43 , and with hints that the rotational plane may vary 15,44 . This view appears to challenge notions of fixed output dimensions to the muscles 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This model fits the data much more closely than previous dynamical systems models. These findings also agree with previous suggestions that motor cortex is higher dimensional than previously thought 43 , and with hints that the rotational plane may vary 15,44 . This view appears to challenge notions of fixed output dimensions to the muscles 20 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Such variations in force directions ( ter Haar Romeny et al, 1984 ; Desnedt and Gidaux, 1981 ) but also other motor behavioural changes, including alternations in postures ( Nardone et al, 1989 ), and contraction speed ( Desmedt and Godaux, 1977a ), potentially have an impact on the recruitment order. Similar changes in an MU pool’s discharge activity imposed by such behavioural changes were recently suggested in non-human primates ( Marshall et al, 2021 ). Therefore, individual MU control may be triggered by small compensatory movements rather than being the result of a dedicated and volitionally controllable individual synaptic inputs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…During a progressive increase in force, recruitment depends only on the MU anatomy and the input received. If humans can learn to leverage potential structures in the CNS that allow selective inputs to MUs ( Marshall et al, 2021 ), changes in the recruitment order during this initial phase should be expected. However, it is important to underline that a conclusion of flexible control based on changes in MU recruitment cannot be drawn for time intervals that follow an activation of the MU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, recent results indicate that subjects may learn to change the motor unit recruitment order, thus, enabling 2D cursor control with three motor units from the same muscle [73]. However, subjects were instructed to perform multiple natural DoF movements to alter recruitment, which is a known way to change the recruitment order [74].…”
Section: True Augmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%