2023
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggad032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexible quasi-2D inversion of time-domain AEM data, using a wavelet-based complexity measure

Abstract: Summary Regularization methods improve the stability of ill-posed inverse problems by introducing some a priori characteristics for the solution such as smoothness or sharpness. In this contribution, we propose a multidimensional, scale-dependent wavelet-based ℓ1-regularization term to cure the ill-posedness of the airborne (time-domain) electromagnetic induction inverse problem. The regularization term is flexible, as it can recover blocky, smooth and tunable in-between inversion models, based … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 46 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Occam's razor is frequently invoked to justify the use of a gradient or roughness operator, which results in smoothness constraint inversion. It can also be incorporated into advanced operators seeking compactness or minimal structure (e.g., Deleersnyder et al 2022, 2021. Such approaches will produce either smooth or "simple" solutions (Loke et al, 2013), which are rarely geologically plausible (Linde et al, 2015;Zhdanov and Tolstaya, 2004); see also Appendix B.…”
Section: Inverse Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occam's razor is frequently invoked to justify the use of a gradient or roughness operator, which results in smoothness constraint inversion. It can also be incorporated into advanced operators seeking compactness or minimal structure (e.g., Deleersnyder et al 2022, 2021. Such approaches will produce either smooth or "simple" solutions (Loke et al, 2013), which are rarely geologically plausible (Linde et al, 2015;Zhdanov and Tolstaya, 2004); see also Appendix B.…”
Section: Inverse Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%