“…The flexoelectric coefficients of most dielectric solids, especially the simple ones, are estimated theoretically to be too small ,, to induce sufficient strain gradient for mechanical switching. Particularly, flexoelectricity can be omitted when other electromechanical responses (e.g., piezoelectricity) exist in the materials. , However, it was later found that in some dielectrics owning to high permittivity, their flexoelectricity is unexpectedly largely enhanced and possibly sufficient to induce polarization, , where the flexoelectric coefficients are in several or even tens of orders of higher magnitude. − These reported high permittivity dielectrics with giant flexoelectricity include paraelectric SrTiO 3 , and perovskite piezoelectrics, especially perovskite relaxors such as PMN, , perovskite ferroelectrics such as Pb-based systems like Pb(Zr,Ti)O 3 , , BaTiO 3 -based systems like BaTiO 3 , , Ba(Ti,Sn)O 3 , BaTiO 3 –Ba(Zr,Ti)O 3 , and (K,Na)NbO 3 -based systems, and perovskite relaxor ferroelectrics like PMN–PT ,,− and PIN–PMN–PT . According to Tagantsev’s flexoelectric theory, , the possible mechanisms of these enhanced flexoelectricity in bulks include four contributions: dynamic bulk flexoelectricity, static bulk flexoelectricity, surface flexoelectricity, and surface piezoelectricity. , The mechanisms of a barrier layer, inner microstrains resulted from macroscopic centric symmetry breaking, ferroelectricity, , and PNRs , are also proposed recently.…”