1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0266-7681(96)80145-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexor Tendon Repair in Zone 2 Followed by Early Active Mobilization

Abstract: The results following primary and delayed primary repair in zone 2 flexor tendon injuries were evaluated prospectively in 88 fingers of 71 patients using two different early postoperative mobilization programmes. In 33 patients, the Kleinert rubber band passive flexion method was used. In the remaining 38 patients, the early active mobilization programme was used. All patients were reviewed 1 year after operation and the results assessed by the Strickland criteria. During this evaluation maximum grip strength … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

5
50
1
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
50
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Modern multistrand repairs and the addition of circumferential sutures have increased the tensile strength of repairs, 10 -13 suggesting that they are adequate to sustain forces in early active mobilization. 8,9,14,15 Many of these biomechanical tests have used the study of forces in FDP tendons during carpal tunnel release by Schuind et al 16 as a benchmark. Several investigators, however, feel that measurement of forces in tendons without prior trauma overlooks increases in work of flexion from postsurgical edema and adhesion formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Modern multistrand repairs and the addition of circumferential sutures have increased the tensile strength of repairs, 10 -13 suggesting that they are adequate to sustain forces in early active mobilization. 8,9,14,15 Many of these biomechanical tests have used the study of forces in FDP tendons during carpal tunnel release by Schuind et al 16 as a benchmark. Several investigators, however, feel that measurement of forces in tendons without prior trauma overlooks increases in work of flexion from postsurgical edema and adhesion formation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 -19 In the clinical setting underestimation of forces after trauma and noncompliance during rehabilitation 20 may explain rupture rates up to 46% of the time, 9 with most between 5% and 10%. [3][4][5][6][7][8]14,15,[21][22][23][24][25] In addition to rupture early mobilization may lead to gapping with adhesion formation and diminished tendon glide and function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early motion after tendon repair, either active or passive, has been shown to reduce adhesion formation and increase the tensile strength of the healing tendon [5,10,33,40,41]. However, early motion may also have the detrimental effect of contributing to gap formation or suture rupture [ 13,27,36,38].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,8,9 Early mobilization is thought to inhibit or disrupt adhesion formation and also to promote intrinsic healing and synovial diffusion, to produce stronger tissue than with immobilization. [8][9][10][11] Despite its benefits, however, the safety and effectiveness of current mobilization techniques remain major concerns. If early active motion is too aggressive, it may also have the detrimental effect of causing gap formation or suture rupture.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%