2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural behavior of wood beams strengthened with HFRP

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several experimental programs have investigated the performance of Reinforced Timber (RT) beams with CFRP, and have shown the effectiveness of using externally-bonded CFRP materials to improve the flexural capacity of RT members [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, most of the previous studies were carried out using CFRP laminates externally attached to the soffit of solid wood beams along the full span length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several experimental programs have investigated the performance of Reinforced Timber (RT) beams with CFRP, and have shown the effectiveness of using externally-bonded CFRP materials to improve the flexural capacity of RT members [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. However, most of the previous studies were carried out using CFRP laminates externally attached to the soffit of solid wood beams along the full span length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang and Liu (2007), Yang et al (2008), Shao and Liu (2007), and Shao et al (2012) conducted experimental studies on the behavior of glulam beams and columns and compared the results of regular beams and FRPreinforced beams; the test results showed that the reinforcement improved the stiffness, the load bearing capacity, and especially the ductility. Li et al (2013) conducted experiments on FRP columns to investigate the effects of different wrapping methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The longitudinal modulus of elasticity of the CFRP profiles, aluminium, and GFRP profiles compared to that of Norway spruce are higher by a factor of 10.0, 5.8, and 3.2, respectively (Table 1). Thus, CFRP profiles should provide the best improvements in bending stiffness and load-bearing capacity [10,14,25]. Despite this, we decided to perform the first phase of the tests with aluminium reinforcements only, in order to define their positioning and orientation effect on the observed parameters and to analyse the possibilities of manufacturing window profiles with non-visible reinforcements.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve bending stiffness, load-bearing capacity and flexural-rigidity the reinforcements need to be positioned near tensile and compressive faces, as far away from the neutral axis as possible [9,15,25,29]. The position and orientation of the reinforcements in the specimens, B, C, and D, were defined, taking into account number of different aspects:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%