1998
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1998)124:9(1041)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural Deformability of Reinforced Concrete Beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In RC and R/FRC beams, subjected to either constant or variable bending moments, it is practically impossible to predict a unique evolution of crack pattern [12]. For these structures, due to the random nature of cracking, it appears more appropriate to define, for a given pair of applied actions M-N (where, M = bending moment; and N = normal force), the maximum and the minimum values of crack width and crack spacing.…”
Section: The Evaluation Of Crack Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In RC and R/FRC beams, subjected to either constant or variable bending moments, it is practically impossible to predict a unique evolution of crack pattern [12]. For these structures, due to the random nature of cracking, it appears more appropriate to define, for a given pair of applied actions M-N (where, M = bending moment; and N = normal force), the maximum and the minimum values of crack width and crack spacing.…”
Section: The Evaluation Of Crack Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial-interaction numerical models [5][6][7][8][9] have been developed in order to gain an understanding of the behaviour of reinforced-concrete hinges. These models often use a shooting method of analysis [10] that requires the determination of the boundary conditions and, hence, are the first step in developing the governing mathematical equations.…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 as discrete and independent elements. Numerous boundary conditions have been used to find a solution [6][7][8][9] such as: full-interaction at the cracked section; equally spaced cracks; and zero slip mid-way between cracks. The next step was to allow for interaction between adjacent elements [5] and this required additional boundary conditions such as the assumption that the crack width varied linearly and the crack faces moved as rigid bodies.…”
Section: Numerical Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such models, as well as the tension stiffening investigation of reinforced concrete structures, consist of the classical equilibrium and compatibility equations (Fantilli et al, 1998). Cohesive interface models are seldom used in the case of fiber pullout, because bond properties of fiber and matrix cannot be generalized, but have to be measured in each single case (Shah and Ouyang, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%