2016
DOI: 10.3390/ma9020083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural Strength of Preheated Resin Composites and Bonding Properties to Glass-Ceramic and Dentin

Abstract: To test the impact of preheating (25, 37, 54, or 68 °C) of TetricEvoCeram (TEC), FiltekSupremeXT (FSXT), and Venus (V) on flexural strength (FS), shear bond strength (SBS) and interfacial tension (IFT). FS was tested with TEC and FSXT. For SBS, glass-ceramic and human dentin substrate were fabricated and luted with the preheated resin composite (RC). SBSs of 1500 thermal cycled specimens were measured. For IFT, glass slides covered with the non-polymerized RC were prepared and contact angles were measured. Dat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the study of Young's modulus dependence on temperature confirm the conclusion that the physical properties of the composite material significantly improve after heating [32] that accepts the second null hypothesis. There is an increase in the rate of Young's modulus by 15% for samples with preliminary pre-polymerization heating.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…The results of the study of Young's modulus dependence on temperature confirm the conclusion that the physical properties of the composite material significantly improve after heating [32] that accepts the second null hypothesis. There is an increase in the rate of Young's modulus by 15% for samples with preliminary pre-polymerization heating.…”
supporting
confidence: 72%
“…24 Compared to RMGIC based sealants, resin based sealants exhibited low microleakage scores. This could be attributed to the fact that flowable resins have a low contact angle at substrate 25 and hence adapt well to enamel at the walls of fissures. Fig- 1 Moreover, compared to RMGIC, the flowable resin forms a stronger micromechanical bond with the tooth structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resin composite has several advantages over amalgam, such as esthetics and biosafety; it also has a reasonable price compared to gold alloy, which makes this material popular among dentists [2]. However, there are some issues with mechanical properties and high polymerization shrinkage that limit the success of the restoration [3,4]. Conventional resin composites have inadequate mechanical properties that will lead to restoration deformation and body fracture under occlusal load [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%