2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2003.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flexural strengthening of RC continuous beams using CFRP laminates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These conditions make most empirical equations (developed for simply supported beams) useless for continuous beams. However, very little research has been published in connection with the behaviour of such continuous beams with external reinforcement (Ashour et al, 2004;Bukhari et al, 2010). In addition, most design guidelines (ACI, 1996; Concrete Society, 2000) were developed for simply supported beams with external FRP laminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These conditions make most empirical equations (developed for simply supported beams) useless for continuous beams. However, very little research has been published in connection with the behaviour of such continuous beams with external reinforcement (Ashour et al, 2004;Bukhari et al, 2010). In addition, most design guidelines (ACI, 1996; Concrete Society, 2000) were developed for simply supported beams with external FRP laminates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen from Table 2 and experimental results of Ashour et al 2004, El-Refaie et al 2003, strengthening both the hogging and sagging regions with CFRP laminate cause to increase significantly load capacity, but ductility of continuous beam is significantly decreased. Also using the GFRP for strengthening the beam (SG3) led to slightly increase the ductility.…”
Section: Ductilitymentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Moment redistribution permits the utilization of the full capacity of more segments of the beam. Akbarzadeh and Maghsoudi (2009a, b), Ashour et al (2004) and El-Refaie et al (2003) found out that strengthening both the top surface at the negative moment and the beam soffit at positive moment region to be the most effective arrangement of the CFRP and GFRP laminates to enhance the load capacity, but ductility and moment redistribution are very low.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiber reinforced polymer (FRP) laminates are widely popular in building construction for the strengthening of structural members (Kachlakev and Alsayed et al 2010;AlSalloum et al 2011;Elsanadedy et al 2012a, b;Alsayed et al 2014;Elsanadedy et al 2015Elsanadedy et al , 2016Shehab et al 2017). The influence of FRP laminates on the response of solid RC beams under flexure (Alagusundaramoorthy et al 2003;Ashour et al 2004;Hawileh et al 2013) and shear (Li et al 2001;Zhang et al 2004;Islam et al 2005) has been widely studied. However, the research on the use of FRP laminates in the strengthening of RC beams with opening is limited Abdalla et al 2003;El Maaddawy and Sherif 2009;Pimanmas 2010;Chin et al 2011;Hawileh et al 2012;Nie et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%