1952
DOI: 10.1152/physrev.1952.32.3.349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flicker Fusion Frequency: Background and Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
104
1

Year Published

1952
1952
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
104
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean of the 13 items was used, a raised value indicating an increase in perception of subjective fatigue. (2) Flicker fusion frequency (FFF): This was used to measure central fatigue (Payne, 1982) (Holmberg, 1981;Simonson & Brozek, 1952). The¯icker fusion frequency device was built at the College and comprised a binocular viewing piece containing four red LEDs connected to a circuit that could vary the¯icker rate of the LEDs between 18 Hz and 216 Hz.…”
Section: Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean of the 13 items was used, a raised value indicating an increase in perception of subjective fatigue. (2) Flicker fusion frequency (FFF): This was used to measure central fatigue (Payne, 1982) (Holmberg, 1981;Simonson & Brozek, 1952). The¯icker fusion frequency device was built at the College and comprised a binocular viewing piece containing four red LEDs connected to a circuit that could vary the¯icker rate of the LEDs between 18 Hz and 216 Hz.…”
Section: Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flickering light was presented for 2 s at 16 Hz (lower than the possible fusion point) and the frequency was altered stepwise according to the pattern of response. Fusion threshold was defined as the lowest frequency at which 50% or more of the last 25 responses were considered to be fused (Simonson & Brozek, 1952;Nicholson & Stone, 1983).…”
Section: Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…), which reflects overall CNS arousal. The subjects were instructed to detect the fusion of a flickering red light (diameter 3 mm) at 1 m distance; expressed in Hz, mean of three observations for each time point (Simonson & Brozek, 1952;Smith & Misiak, 1976 (Goldstein et al, 1981). The method had a detection limit of 0.10 nM, and its intra-assay coefficient of variation was about 5% for noradrenaline and 10% for adrenaline in the physiological concentration range.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%