Aerial Vehicles 2009
DOI: 10.5772/6470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight Control System Design Optimisation via Genetic Programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of disturbances and the initial ship phase are chosen to provide a moderately conservative estimation of controller performance. Results for different dynamic scenarios are presented in (Bourmistrova & Khantsis, 2009). The parameters corresponding to aircraft geometry and configuration are tested in a similar manner.…”
Section: Controller Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of disturbances and the initial ship phase are chosen to provide a moderately conservative estimation of controller performance. Results for different dynamic scenarios are presented in (Bourmistrova & Khantsis, 2009). The parameters corresponding to aircraft geometry and configuration are tested in a similar manner.…”
Section: Controller Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where (Bourmistrova & Khantsis, 2009). The parameters corresponding to aircraft geometry and configuration are tested in a similar manner.…”
Section: Controller Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Application of the ED algorithm to control laws evolution is fairly straightforward: 1) preparation of the sample task for the controller, 2) execution of the simulation model for the given sample task and 3) analysis of the obtained performance and evaluation of the fitness value. For a greater detail of control system design reader is referred to (Bourmistrova & Khantsis, 2009). When both the model and fitness evaluation are prepared, the final evolution may be started.…”
Section: Controller Synthesis and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%