Proceedings of the International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction in Aerospace 2014
DOI: 10.1145/2669592.2669690
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight deck human-automation issue detection via intent inference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 For example, issues in flight deck human-automation interactions may be detected using anomaly detection. 17,18 Our prior work involved finding precursors to go-arounds, 4 highenergy approach and landing issues 19 and stall hazard 6 using the ADOPT algorithm discussed in this paper. This paper is an extension of the previous works that includes several scenarios of safety precursors under different problem setups.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 For example, issues in flight deck human-automation interactions may be detected using anomaly detection. 17,18 Our prior work involved finding precursors to go-arounds, 4 highenergy approach and landing issues 19 and stall hazard 6 using the ADOPT algorithm discussed in this paper. This paper is an extension of the previous works that includes several scenarios of safety precursors under different problem setups.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the dataset consisting of 20000 flights, used in Section 6.2.2, only 673 unique modes exist (0.3% of 262144). The number of hidden phases was set to n x = 5, after some preliminary experiments in which we tested several n x in range [3,20] and selected n x balancing a good prediction accuracy with low computational complexity of algorithm. We have selected flights with landings at the same destination airport with aircrafts of the same fleet and type, so that we eliminate potential differences related to aircraft dynamics or landing patterns.…”
Section: Real Flight Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches base their decisions of anomalies on data itself and not on the models that generate the data. 12 Taking a model-driven detection approach is computationally beneficial because detecting deviations of the actual data from the true model is much efficient.…”
Section: A Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of the proposed research is to implement a general framework as initially proposed by Lee et al, 12 for UI validation purposes using mode confusion detection (by validating on various mode confusion incidents/accidents) from the control-theoretic perspective. An intent-based framework for mode confusion detection is proposed because the mode confusion is the divergence in expectations or intents of the automation and the pilot about the actual behavior of the aircraft.…”
Section: B Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation