2018
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1106/1/012033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight envelope expansion based on active mitigation of flutter via a V-stack piezoelectric actuator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tests performed in WT established that the flutter speed was 41 m/s and the flutter frequency was 5.8 Hz [41]. Thus, the flutter speed of 41 m/s and the flutter frequency of 5.8 Hz were experimentally measured, as the effect can be seen in Figure 1 (see also work [41]). These values were not intended as actual values for a specific aircraft.…”
Section: Smart Wing System With Active Controlmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The tests performed in WT established that the flutter speed was 41 m/s and the flutter frequency was 5.8 Hz [41]. Thus, the flutter speed of 41 m/s and the flutter frequency of 5.8 Hz were experimentally measured, as the effect can be seen in Figure 1 (see also work [41]). These values were not intended as actual values for a specific aircraft.…”
Section: Smart Wing System With Active Controlmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…One design requirement was to ensure the occurrence of flutter for the uncontrolled system in INCAS subsonic WT [32]. The tests performed in WT established that the flutter speed was 41 m/s and the flutter frequency was 5.8 Hz [41]. Thus, the flutter speed of 41 m/s and the flutter frequency of 5.8 Hz were experimentally measured, as the effect can be seen in Figure 1 (see also work [41]).…”
Section: Smart Wing System With Active Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations