2012 IEEE/AIAA 31st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/dasc.2012.6382432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight Guardian: A common avionics architecture for collision avoidance and safe emergency landing for unmanned aerial systems

Abstract: This paper presents an approach to derive requirements for an avionics architecture that provides onboard sense-and-avoid and autonomous emergency forced landing capabilities to a UAS. The approach is based on two design paradigms that (1) derive requirements analyzing the common functionality between these two functions to then derive requirements for sensors, computing capability, interfaces, etc.(2) consider the risk and safety mitigation associated with these functions to derive certification requirements … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A system that can land an aircraft or adapt its flight control in response to an engine failure, actuator faults, loss of sensor readings or any other onboard failure is key in highly autonomous aircraft [ 26 , 75 ]. A system like this, will likely require a number of processing stages, each demanding some computational capability from onboard resources [ 76 ].…”
Section: Definition and Categorisation Of Onboard Unmanned Aircrafmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A system that can land an aircraft or adapt its flight control in response to an engine failure, actuator faults, loss of sensor readings or any other onboard failure is key in highly autonomous aircraft [ 26 , 75 ]. A system like this, will likely require a number of processing stages, each demanding some computational capability from onboard resources [ 76 ].…”
Section: Definition and Categorisation Of Onboard Unmanned Aircrafmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assign an integer value in the range [1,10] to each of the three aspects of the ALFUS model, HI, MC and EC, for each application (see Figure 4 and Table 2). Based on experience [26,34,76], we propose a number of tasks required to ensure feasibility of each application. We then provide three ways to estimate the UAS AL metric, mode, median and mean (arithmetic) of the three values for HI, MC and EC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%