2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2010.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight path reconstruction – A comparison of nonlinear Kalman filter and smoother algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed an unscented Kalman filter (UKF) to determine biases associated to each sensor in the inertial measurement unit and to reconstruct UAV trajectory from low frequency GPS data. The results were compared with an extended Kalman filter, which was outperformed in all aspects [14].…”
Section: Attitude and Heading Reference Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed an unscented Kalman filter (UKF) to determine biases associated to each sensor in the inertial measurement unit and to reconstruct UAV trajectory from low frequency GPS data. The results were compared with an extended Kalman filter, which was outperformed in all aspects [14].…”
Section: Attitude and Heading Reference Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent article [16] a comparison of both the EKF and UKF is done for the particular case of flight path reconstruction for a fixed-wing UAV. This article includes an interesting discussion of previous references that illustrate the improved performance of the UKF over EKF estimating the attitude of an UAV.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Namely, the analytical approximation (or function approximation) methods, the positive sampling methods, and the random sampling methods [7][8][9][10]. The representatives for each class are the extended Kalman filter (EKF) [11][12][13], the sigma point Kalman filter (SPKF) [14][15][16], and the particle filter [17], respectively. EKF is known to be effective to the systems that are linear or near linear, which has poor robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%