AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-2559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight Path Reconstruction Techniques Applied to Spin Tests

Abstract: This work presents a new approach adopted in the application of flight path reconstruction (FPR) techniques to overcome limitations in the flight test instrumentation (FTI), even when one or more flight test parameters are unreliable or corrupted. The main motivation arose from the necessity of measurement of true airspeed during spin tests, for modeling purposes. However, airspeed measurements become unreliable during spin maneuvers, due to Pitot tube ineffectiveness when subjected to angles of attack and sid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For context, the standard glide slope from an instrument landing system for passenger aircraft is three degrees. The airspeed shown in Table 1 for the spin manoeuvre is estimated from the combined ground and descent speeds, since at such large angles of attack and sideslip the dynamic pressure reading from pitot tubes become unreliable (14,15) ; in excess of 40° is reported in Ref. 15.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For context, the standard glide slope from an instrument landing system for passenger aircraft is three degrees. The airspeed shown in Table 1 for the spin manoeuvre is estimated from the combined ground and descent speeds, since at such large angles of attack and sideslip the dynamic pressure reading from pitot tubes become unreliable (14,15) ; in excess of 40° is reported in Ref. 15.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The airspeed shown in Table 1 for the spin manoeuvre is estimated from the combined ground and descent speeds, since at such large angles of attack and sideslip the dynamic pressure reading from pitot tubes become unreliable (14,15) ; in excess of 40° is reported in Ref. 15. The airspeed measurement during the spin averaged at 7•6ms -1 but the ground speed was low (an average of 2•3ms -1 ), hence the actual airspeed must have been larger given the large descent rate.…”
Section: Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%