21st AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference and Seminar 2011
DOI: 10.2514/6.2011-2620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flight Test Results for Glide Slope Control of Parafoil Canopies of Various Aspect Ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The achievable turn rate for any PADS has a practical limit, since a steep turn rate could induce spiral divergence. For a vehicle with similar characteristics as the simulated in this study, Ward et al [ 39 , 40 ] report maximum turn rates from 15 deg/s up to 25 deg/s, depending on the flight mode and control scheme. For the case of larger parafoil-payload vehicles, Lingard [ 11 ] reports a maximum constant turn rate of deg/s for a canopy with 30 m of wingspan.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The achievable turn rate for any PADS has a practical limit, since a steep turn rate could induce spiral divergence. For a vehicle with similar characteristics as the simulated in this study, Ward et al [ 39 , 40 ] report maximum turn rates from 15 deg/s up to 25 deg/s, depending on the flight mode and control scheme. For the case of larger parafoil-payload vehicles, Lingard [ 11 ] reports a maximum constant turn rate of deg/s for a canopy with 30 m of wingspan.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…These systems were chosen to examine the effect of scale on payload weight shift as a control mechanism. The small system is called the GT-Imp and was flight tested by Ward et al at the Georgia Institute of Technology [27]. The second system was flight tested by NASA for the X-38 program [28].…”
Section: Example Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This minimizes the effect of coupled system uncertainity and ensures a maximum heading deviation from the estimated wind direction. Recent efforts by Ward and Costello [14,29] have also demonstrated the potential for improved glide-slope tracking through both online system identification, and by exploiting the longitudinal control coupling between incidence angle and symmetric brake deflection. To summarize, while the above approaches [14,[27][28][29] take some measures to account for the effect of wind uncertainty on the parafoil landing position, they offer no robustness to interaction with terrain obstacles, and are subject to the fundamental constraining of the solution space imposed by the glide-slope approach paradigm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%