2022
DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2020.3015480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flipping Free Conditions and Their Application in Sparse Network Localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The geographical locations of nodes are fundamental information for many multi-agent applications [10], [11], [12]. Network localization techniques are usually adopted for calculating node locations in infrastructure-less scenarios [13], [14], which are formulated as follows. For a network of m + n agents in R d , let V = A ∪ F denote the entire node set.…”
Section: B the Network Localization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geographical locations of nodes are fundamental information for many multi-agent applications [10], [11], [12]. Network localization techniques are usually adopted for calculating node locations in infrastructure-less scenarios [13], [14], which are formulated as follows. For a network of m + n agents in R d , let V = A ∪ F denote the entire node set.…”
Section: B the Network Localization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, CL systems remain highly susceptible to flip-ambiguities. Viewing the system as a graph, rigidity theory shows that flip-ambiguity occurs when a sub-graph flips across an axis without edge constraints violations [1]. In other words, when sub-groups of correctly positioned nodes (in the subgroup) are connected with other such sub-groups, incorrectly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) To facilitate the reproduction of our results and future comparisons, we openly release ARLCL source code 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%