Flipping the paradigm: a qualitative exploration of research translation centres in the United Kingdom and Australia

Abstract

Background Over the past decade, Research Translation Centres (RTCs) have been established in many countries. These centres (sometimes referred to as Academic Health Science Centres) are designed to bring universities and healthcare providers together in order to accelerate the generation and translation of new evidence that is responsive to health service and community priorities. This has the potential to effectively ‘flip’ the traditional research and education paradigms because it requires active participation and continuous engagement with stakeholders (especially service users, the community and frontline clinicians). Although investment and expectations of RTCs are high, the literature confirms a need to better understand the processes that RTCs use to mobilise knowledge, build workforce capacity, and co-produce research with patients and the public to ensure population impact and drive healthcare improvement. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with selected leaders and members from select RTCs in England and Australia. Convenience sampling was utilised to identify RTCs, based on their geography, accessibility and availability. Purposive sampling and a snowballing approach were employed to recruit individual participants for interviews, which were conducted face to face or via videoconferencing. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using a reflexive and inductive approach. This involved two researchers comparing codes and interrogating themes that were analysed inductively against the study aims and through meetings with the research team. Results A total of 41 participants, 22 from England and 19 from Australia were interviewed. Five major themes emerged, including (1) dissonant metrics, (2) different models of leadership, (3) public and patient involvement and research co-production, (4) workforce development and (5) barriers to collaboration. Conclusions Participants identified the need for performance measures that capture community impact. Better aligned success metrics, enhanced leadership, strategies to partner with patients and the public, enhanced workforce development and strategies to enhance collaboration were all identified as crucial for RTCs to succeed.

“There hasn’t been a career structure to step into”: a qualitative study on perceptions of allied health clinician researcher careers

“…Additionally, the literature is clear that research driven by, or including, clinically active investigators results in improved translation of results and better patient outcomes [ 1 – 5 ], as clinicians are able to utilize their experience to shape patient- and health service-relevant research [ 4 ]. The valuable role of clinician researchers in United Kingdom and Australian research translation centres has been emphasized, as well as the need to further support and develop this workforce [ 6 ]. At a national level in Australia, “clinician researcher capability” has been identified as one of the priorities of the Medical Research Future Fund [ 7 ], and was highlighted as a key target for research capacity-building in the 2012 McKeon Review [ 8 ].…”

When Health Systems Consider Research to Be Beyond the Scope of Healthcare Delivery, Research Translation Is Crippled Comment on "Academic Health Science Centres as Vehicles for Knowledge Mobilisation in Australia? A Qualitative Study"

“…13 The recent UK-Australia RTC qualitative study found: "Significant challenges in integrating applied healthcare and improvement approaches with more rigorous discovery and implementation research. " 2 The authors attributed this tension to: 'Dissonant metrics between academic and healthcare sectors. ' 2 Yet awareness of the limited value to society that may be reflected in traditional academic output indicators underlies current interest in research impact assessment.…”

Pressure Injury Surveillance and Prevention in Australia: Monash Partners Capacity Building Framework

“…In 2019, an AHRA steering committee proposed a National project aimed at addressing the challenges in wound care through an integrated, evidence-based approach (48). Monash Partners along with other NHMRC-accredited centres supports the integration of research, education, and clinical practise, overcoming the organisational silos and barriers to research translation (49), such as in HAPI prevention.…”