1989
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floating norms as a means to describe individual skeletal patterns

Abstract: An adequate analysis of the skeletal pattern is essential since a considerable amount of dental compensation can mask the severity of a malocclusion. Disagreement prevails over the standards that should be used to judge the individual values. The paper describes a method of analyzing the skeletal pattern of a patient on an individualized basis. Rather than relating the individual cephalometric values to population means the method employs standards derived from the individual facial type (floating norms). The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
44
0
16

Year Published

2000
2000
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
44
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…As long as the cephalometric measurements of the subject lie inside the harmony schema (despite their absolute values) the skeletal pattern may be considered harmonious. A harmonious combination from a correlation point of view would not necessarily require the values to lie on a perfectly straight horizontal line (Segner, 1989). According to three zones inside the box (prognathic, ortognathic and retrognathic) a type of face may be described as prognathic but still harmonious, orthognathic and harmonious and retrognathic and harmonious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As long as the cephalometric measurements of the subject lie inside the harmony schema (despite their absolute values) the skeletal pattern may be considered harmonious. A harmonious combination from a correlation point of view would not necessarily require the values to lie on a perfectly straight horizontal line (Segner, 1989). According to three zones inside the box (prognathic, ortognathic and retrognathic) a type of face may be described as prognathic but still harmonious, orthognathic and harmonious and retrognathic and harmonious.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hasund et al (1974) first described combinations of acceptable values for different facial types. Finally, a comprehensive analysis for the assessment of individual craniofacial patterns was performed by Segner (1989) and Segner and Hasund (1994), who constructed floating norms for the description of sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships in a sample of European adults. The method is based on the correlations among the following craniofacial measurements: SNA, SNB, NL-NSL, ML-NSL, and NSBa ( Figure 1).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[23][24][25][26] The two variables that indicate a sagittal jaw position, S-N-B e S-N-Pg, statistically were the same in both males and females; however, the male population has a slightly advanced position of the mandible. Other authors 24,27 had significantly different values in both sexes. This may be justified because these authors did not include an aesthetic criteria as part of the selection process of their samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Those authors who use the NA line for assessing the upper incisor's axial inclination recommend an angle of approximately 22Њ. 1,3,10,27 By subtracting the mean deviation between the two values of our present sample, we obtain a value of 5.8Њ for the 1TA variable. Consequently, the result of the present study is in agreement with Andrews' examination outcomes: Andrews 4,28 derived a 7Њ torque angle for upper incisors from dental cast examination of an ''ideal'' occlusion sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%