1972
DOI: 10.1061/jsedai.0001389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floc Breakup in Turbulent Flocculation Processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model shows a good fit of the experimental data, and generally, good linearity between the floc size and the shear rate on the logarithmic scale is observed for a number of experimental studies [17,18]. The method is simple to implement and requires few experimental tests, although there is some confusion in the literature as to how to interpret the model; some researchers interpret log C as a resistance parameter and the value of γ as the dominant mode of degradation of flocs [13,15,16,19], while another interpretation considers γ as a resistance parameter against an increase in shear [20]. Like the strength factor, this model does not provide complete information on the response of a floc to applying different levels of shear rate once it has been formed under established conditions (flocculation time and intensity of agitation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model shows a good fit of the experimental data, and generally, good linearity between the floc size and the shear rate on the logarithmic scale is observed for a number of experimental studies [17,18]. The method is simple to implement and requires few experimental tests, although there is some confusion in the literature as to how to interpret the model; some researchers interpret log C as a resistance parameter and the value of γ as the dominant mode of degradation of flocs [13,15,16,19], while another interpretation considers γ as a resistance parameter against an increase in shear [20]. Like the strength factor, this model does not provide complete information on the response of a floc to applying different levels of shear rate once it has been formed under established conditions (flocculation time and intensity of agitation).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…These researchers analyzed the evolution of floc size, gradually increasing the shear of the suspensions. Then, they performed a linearization through the Parker equation [16], as indicated in Equation ( 2…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flocculation processes could be integrated, as they play a key role in sediment transport due to the fact that the density and the shape of flocs differ from those of individual sediment particles. As a result, their displacement in the water column is different from that of isolated sediment particles (Parker, 1972;Van der Lee, 2009). The integration of flocculation process could be implemented by coupling a morphodynamic model with a floc population model such as FLOCMOD (Verney et al, 2009;Lepesqueur et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adhesive forces between components of a single aggregate contribute to the strength of that aggregate and its ability to resist being broken up. Fragmentation of marine particles can result from turbulent fluid motion (Parker et al, 1972;Alldredge et al, 1990) and mechanical breakage arising from interactions between particles and zooplankton (Dilling and Alldredge, 2000). Indeed, a variety of physical and biological processes (Briggs et al, 2020) can result in particle breakup, including shear stress (Karl et al, 1988;Ruiz, 1997) as well as zooplankton swimming and sloppy feeding (Banse, 1995;Steinberg et al, 1997;Dilling and Alldredge, 2000;Goldtwhait et al, 2004;Giering et al, 2016).…”
Section: Toward a Synthesis Of Processes And Pathways Of Mos Formation In Determining The Fate Of Hydrocarbonsmentioning
confidence: 99%