“…Since then, it has become clear that complete classification in the Miquelian Laguerre case is extremely difficult, with further constructions appearing in [10], [34], [25], [32], [9], and so attention has turned to small field orders. The previously known classification results are [41] for fields of orders 2, 3, 4 and De Clerck- Gevaert-Thas (1988) [11] for fields of orders 5, 7, 8 (these are computerfree results); Mylle (1991) [27] for the field of order 9, De Clerck-Herssens (1992) [12] for the fields of orders 11, 16, Penttila-Royle (1998) [35] for the fields of orders 13, 17, Brown-O'Keefe-Payne-Penttila-Royle [7] for the field of order 32 (these are computer-based results), see Theorem 2.6. Here we add the fields of orders 19, 23, 25, 27 and 29 to the list, finding that there are exactly 8 flocks of the quadratic cone in PG (3,19) (Corollary 4.7), 18 flocks of the quadratic cone in PG(3,23) (Corollary 5.8), 12 flocks of the quadratic cone in PG(3,25) (Corollary 6.3), 14 flocks of the quadratic cone in PG (3,27) (Corollary 7.3), and 28 flocks of the quadratic cone in PG(3,29) (Corollary 8.3), up to equivalence, with these being computer-based results.…”