2016
DOI: 10.21660/2016.27.1143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood Analysis in Langat River Basin Using Stochatic Model

Abstract: This study analyzed the annual maximum stage readings of three rivers in Langat River Basin for flood forecasting using Autoregressive Integrated Moving-average(ARIMA) model. Model identification was done by visual inspection on the Autocorrelation Function(ACF) and Partial Autocorrelation Function(PACF). The model parameters were computed using the Maximum Likelihood (ML) method. In model verification, the chosen criterion for model parsimony was the Akaike Information Criteria Corrected(AICC) and the diagnos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we confirmed that the selected model is adequate for the corresponding SPI time series at each station. To determine whether the ability of the model to predict variable values is consistent, it is important to verify the homoscedasticity of the residuals [35]. The homoscedasticity of the residuals was checked by the scatterplot of the residuals against predicted values.…”
Section: Diagnostic Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we confirmed that the selected model is adequate for the corresponding SPI time series at each station. To determine whether the ability of the model to predict variable values is consistent, it is important to verify the homoscedasticity of the residuals [35]. The homoscedasticity of the residuals was checked by the scatterplot of the residuals against predicted values.…”
Section: Diagnostic Checkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides some of the spikes were outside the confidence interval and some very close to it. This indicated the values were significant and were not white noise [HUANG et al 2016] [1] . The model that gives the minimum Bayer's Information Criterion (BIC) is selected as best fit model, as shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the stationary time series is easily predicted and it is a serious assumption made by many models while making predictions from the past values (Nua, 2014). In this study, we used Augmented Dickey Fuller (ADF) test, Kwiatkowski-Phillips-Schmidt-Shin (KPSS), Mann-Kendall test (Huang et al, 2016) to check the stationarity of the weather data.…”
Section: Stationary Of Datamentioning
confidence: 99%