“…This issue generates the need for methods that aim at identifying the loopholes in emergency response plans before disasters occur. So far approaches which were introduced to deal with this problem can be categorized as follows: (a) Approaches based on stakeholder consultation and periodic drills, collaboration exercises and strategic exercises, (Perry, 2004;Berlin & Carlström, 2014;Peterson & Perry, 1999;Gwynne et al, 2020), (b) serious games approaches (Rothkrantz, 2016;Brawley, 2016), (c) computer based simulations (Chen, Zhang, Sun, & Liu, 2016;Khalil, Abdel-Aziz, Nazmy, & Salem, 2009), (d) formal modeling approaches to compare existing disaster plans (Hoogendoorn, Jonker, Popova, Sharpanskykh, & Xu, 2005),(e) a suite of tools for emergency plan management support like SAGA (Gai, Du, & Deng, 2018;Canós, Borges, Penadés, Gómez, &Llavador, 2013) and (f) content and semantic analysis methods (Jung, Song, & Park, 2017;Khalid & Yusof, 2018). This dissertation introduces a new methodology that aims at: a) identifying the emergency plans' loopholes and b) providing a numerical value that indicates what the "distance" of the emergency response plan is against a version of the plan that has addressed the identified loopholes.…”