2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-021-05903-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic, and MCDM methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are studies with the joint application of the Promethee multicriteria method and Machine Learning prediction in financial decision making (Mousavi & Lin, 2020); and a new hybrid fuzzy prediction method is introduced by combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and machine learning model (Ozdemir et al, 2021). For applications to energy or classification problems: fuzzy interval time series energy and financial forecasting model (Liu et al, 2020); flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic and MCDM methods (Akay, 2021); assessment of a failure prediction model in the energy sector with multicriteria discrimination approach, Promethee based classification (Angilella & Pappalardo, 2021); hybrid neurofuzzy investigation of short-term variability of wind resource (Adedeji et al, 2021); TOPSIS-ELM framework for stock index price movement prediction (Samal & Dash, 2021); cost-sensitive business failure prediction when misclassification costs are uncertain (Bock et al, 2020); multi objective optimization of crude oil supply portfolio based on interval prediction data (Sun et al, 2022); optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response (Mohammadiun et al, 2021); use of PairCode algorithm for ordinal classification based on pairwise comparison (Yang et al, 2020); and client profile prediction using convolutional neural networks (Nedjah et al, 2022). In addition, there are studies that show the application of the PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 multi-criteria method to the analysis of OECD countries (Pereira et al, 2022) and multicriteria analysis applied to aircraft selection, case in Brazilian Navy (Maêda et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are studies with the joint application of the Promethee multicriteria method and Machine Learning prediction in financial decision making (Mousavi & Lin, 2020); and a new hybrid fuzzy prediction method is introduced by combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and machine learning model (Ozdemir et al, 2021). For applications to energy or classification problems: fuzzy interval time series energy and financial forecasting model (Liu et al, 2020); flood hazards susceptibility mapping using statistical, fuzzy logic and MCDM methods (Akay, 2021); assessment of a failure prediction model in the energy sector with multicriteria discrimination approach, Promethee based classification (Angilella & Pappalardo, 2021); hybrid neurofuzzy investigation of short-term variability of wind resource (Adedeji et al, 2021); TOPSIS-ELM framework for stock index price movement prediction (Samal & Dash, 2021); cost-sensitive business failure prediction when misclassification costs are uncertain (Bock et al, 2020); multi objective optimization of crude oil supply portfolio based on interval prediction data (Sun et al, 2022); optimization of integrated fuzzy decision tree and regression models for selection of oil spill response (Mohammadiun et al, 2021); use of PairCode algorithm for ordinal classification based on pairwise comparison (Yang et al, 2020); and client profile prediction using convolutional neural networks (Nedjah et al, 2022). In addition, there are studies that show the application of the PROMETHEE-SAPEVO-M1 multi-criteria method to the analysis of OECD countries (Pereira et al, 2022) and multicriteria analysis applied to aircraft selection, case in Brazilian Navy (Maêda et al, 2021).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MCDM has been proven to be useful in resolving conflicts between tangible and intangible parts in the machine tool selection (Li et al 2020). It has been observed that various scholars used MCDM techniques in their work to delineate flood hazard zonation (Fernandez and Lutz 2010;Das 2018), flood susceptible mapping (Akay 2021;Ahmadlou et al 2021), flood vulnerability mapping (Atijosan et al 2021, Sarkar et al 2021, flood risk mapping (Radwan et al 2019), flash floods analysis Costache et al 2021), and flood forecasting (Haghizadeh et al 2017;Teh Noranis et al 2019). In contemporary studies, the MCDM technique, viz.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) (Das 2020;Das and Gupta 2021), Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (Hasanloo et al 2019), Discrete Choice Analysis (Wassenaar and Chen 2003), Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) (Sari 2021), Preference Ranking Organization Method (Chen 2021), Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacijaik Ompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) (Wang et al 2019), Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) (Ghorabaee et al 2017), and Multi-objective Optimization on the basis Ratio Analysis (Karande and Chakraborty 2012), takes a dominant role to handle flood hazard susceptibility and vulnerability mapping. In this study, the researchers have attempted to manifest the flood susceptibility modelling of the region using the TOPSIS, VIKOR, and EDAS MCDM methods, which are become preferably and frequently used in regional flood studies (Arabameri et al 2019;Khosravi et al 2019;Akay 2021;Axelsson et al 2021;Zanganeh Asadi et al 2021). All the MCDM methods are selected due to their high efficiency in making the decision based on multiple criteria (Song and Chung 2016;Siregar et al 2018;Stanujkic et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, commonly used RS techniques used to determine flood extents include histogram thresholding to generate binary maps (di Baldassarre et al, 2011), change detection (Huang & Jin, 2020), change detection and thresholding (CDAT) (Long et al, 2014), principal component analysis and statistical and hybrid methods (Akay, 2021). Determination of flood depth involves the fusion of surface extent with elevation data (di Baldassarre et al, 2011; Schumann et al, 2007), while flow velocity is a function of slope: a derivative of elevation data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%