Flood Prediction Using Machine Learning Models: Literature Review

Abstract

Floods are among the most destructive natural disasters, which are highly complex to model. The research on the advancement of flood prediction models contributed to risk reduction, policy suggestion, minimization of the loss of human life, and reduction the property damage associated with floods. To mimic the complex mathematical expressions of physical processes of floods, during the past two decades, machine learning (ML) methods contributed highly in the advancement of prediction systems providing better performance and cost-effective solutions. Due to the vast benefits and potential of ML, its popularity dramatically increased among hydrologists.Researchers through introducing novel ML methods and hybridizing of the existing ones aim at discovering more accurate and efficient prediction models. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate the state of the art of ML models in flood prediction and to give insight into the most suitable models. In this paper, the literature where ML models were benchmarked through a qualitative analysis of robustness, accuracy, effectiveness, and speed are particularly investigated to provide an extensive overview on the various ML algorithms used in the field. The performance comparison of ML models presents an in-depth understanding of the different techniques within the framework of a comprehensive evaluation and discussion. As a result, this paper introduces the most promising prediction methods for both long-term and short-term floods. Furthermore, the major trends in improving the quality of the flood prediction models are investigated. Among them, hybridization, data decomposition, algorithm ensemble, and model optimization are reported as the most effective strategies for the improvement of ML methods. This survey can be used as a guideline for hydrologists as well as climate scientists in choosing the proper ML method according to the prediction task. Keywords: flood prediction; flood forecasting; flash-flood model, big flood management; hydrologic model; rainfall-runoff, hybrid & ensemble machine learning; artificial neural networks (ANNs); support vector machines (SVM); natural hazards & disasters; adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS); decision trees (DT); internet of things (IoT); random forest (RF); survey; classification and regression trees (CART), data science; deep learning; big data; bagging, boosting, artificial intelligence (AI); soft computing; extreme event management; time series prediction; multilayer perceptron (MLP); simulated annealing (SA); multivariate adaptive regression splines (MARS), supervised learning IntroductionAmong the natural disasters, floods are the most destructive, causing massive damage to human life, infrastructure, agriculture, and the socioeconomic system.Governments, therefore, are under pressure to develop reliable and accurate maps of flood risk areas and further plan for sustainable flood risk management focusing on prevention, protection, and preparedness [1]. Flood prediction models are of significant impor...

A Rainfall‐Runoff Model With LSTM‐Based Sequence‐to‐Sequence Learning

“…There are many different ANN architectures used for hydrological modeling, such as the backpropagation neural network (Sajikumar & Thandaveswara, 1999) and recurrent neural networks (RNNs) (Nagesh Kumar et al, 2004). Although robust ANN model development approaches are still needed (Maier et al, 2010), studies have shown that ANNs can predict the runoff more accurately than can the classical regression models (Mosavi et al, 2018;Riad et al, 2004).…”

Performance Analysis of Combine Harvester Using Hybrid Model of Artificial Neural Networks Particle Swarm Optimization

“…The hybridization of machine learning methods has shown to be an essential approach to improve the performance of the prediction models. For the future research, advancement of hybrid and ensemble machine learning models, e.g., [23][24][25][26][27][28], and comparative analysis with deep learning models, e.g., [29][30][31][32] are proposed to identify models with higher efficiency.…”

Comparative Analysis of Single and Hybrid Neuro-Fuzzy-Based Models for an Industrial Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning Control System

“…The ANFIS-PSO model with the RMSE of 0.0065, MAE of 0.0028, and R2 equal to 0.9999, with a minimum deviation of 0.0691 (KJ/s), outperforms the ANFIS-GA and single ANFIS models. For the future research, advancement of hybrid and ensemble machine learning models, e.g., [47][48][49][50][51][52], and comparative analysis with deep learning models, e.g., [53][54][55][56] are proposed to identify models with higher efficiency.…”