2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2019.103422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood propagation modeling with the Local Inertia Approximation: Theoretical and numerical analysis of its physical limitations

Abstract: Attention of the researchers has increased towards a simplification of the complete Shallow waterEquations called the Local Inertia Approximation (LInA), which is obtained by neglecting the advection term in the momentum conservation equation. This model, whose physical basis is discussed here, is commonly used for the simulation of slow flooding phenomena characterized by small velocities and absence of flow discontinuities. In the present paper it is demonstrated that a shock is always developed at moving we… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…57 Numerous studies have used this test to comprehensively evaluate the numerical schemes. 42,54,58 It consists of a periodic motion of planar water surface in a parabolic basin…”
Section: Scenario Iii: Thacker Test Case (Analytical Solution)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…57 Numerous studies have used this test to comprehensively evaluate the numerical schemes. 42,54,58 It consists of a periodic motion of planar water surface in a parabolic basin…”
Section: Scenario Iii: Thacker Test Case (Analytical Solution)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present Sub-section, the mathematical and numerical LInA and Zero-Inertia models are presented. Despite the controversy about viability of the LInA model in flooding applications (Cozzolino et al 2019), this model is considered here because it is often applied after the decoupling of friction vector components.…”
Section: Mathematical and Numerical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possibility consists of simplifying the physical processes, for example, neglecting advection or inertia terms (Neal et al., 2012 ). While in general this seems to be a computationally very efficient alternative, efficiencies may drop for urban regions (Costabile et al., 2020 ) and for receding flows including wet‐dry boundaries (Cozzolino et al., 2019 ). Cozzolino et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cozzolino et al. ( 2019 ) conclude that numerical issues in these problematic regions may originate from simplifying the shallow water equations (SWEs) while discretizations of the full SWEs are not subject to these limitations. Second‐order finite‐volume (FV) schemes (Audusse & Bristeau, 2005 ; Hou et al., 2015 ; Murillo et al., 2008 ) or discontinuous Galerkin (DG) schemes (Kesserwani et al., 2008 ; Shaw et al., 2021 ; Vater et al., 2017 ) offer additional accuracy, however at the cost of higher runtimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%