2005
DOI: 10.1175/bams-86-11-1593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood Risk, Uncertainty, and Scientific Information for Decision Making: Lessons from an Interdisciplinary Project

Abstract: This essay discusses the complex ways in which scientific information and uncertainty can interact with societal decision making, and proposes a collaborative, integrated approach to societally useful scientific research.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
205
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
205
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays, for example, weather forecasts out to 10 days and beyond provide the basis for decisionmaking (e.g. Morss et al, 2005). Moreover, analysis or reanalysis data (Kalnay et al, 1996;Uppala et al, 2005), which to varying degrees (depending on the parameters and the region being considered) are based on a first guess (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays, for example, weather forecasts out to 10 days and beyond provide the basis for decisionmaking (e.g. Morss et al, 2005). Moreover, analysis or reanalysis data (Kalnay et al, 1996;Uppala et al, 2005), which to varying degrees (depending on the parameters and the region being considered) are based on a first guess (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientific information about hydrological risk is only one of many components which contribute to decisions concerning flood protection. If the scientific uncertainties are emphasized too much it complicates the already difficult process of decision making (Morss, 2005). Better and more complete information does not necessarily lead to better policies; very complex information can affect the decision making process negatively.…”
Section: Integration Of Fuzzy Numbers In Multiple Criteria Decision Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…hydraulic engineers, hydrologists and modelers) and the use of that expert knowledge by practitioners (i.e. policy analysts or political decision-makers) (Morss, Wilhelmi et al 2005;Faulkner, Parker et al 2007;McCarthy, Tunstall et al 2007;Demeritt, Nobert et al 2010). Flood policy decision making can be characterized as a complex and uncertain problem environment due to its complex hydrodynamic processes, the interrelation with socio-economic issues and the involvement of many different stakeholders (Downton, Morss et al 2005;Morss, Wilhelmi et al 2005;Timmerman, Beinat et al 2010).…”
Section: The Case Of Flood Policy Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…policy analysts or political decision-makers) (Morss, Wilhelmi et al 2005;Faulkner, Parker et al 2007;McCarthy, Tunstall et al 2007;Demeritt, Nobert et al 2010). Flood policy decision making can be characterized as a complex and uncertain problem environment due to its complex hydrodynamic processes, the interrelation with socio-economic issues and the involvement of many different stakeholders (Downton, Morss et al 2005;Morss, Wilhelmi et al 2005;Timmerman, Beinat et al 2010). Expert knowledge, including the outputs of flood simulation modelling, can therefore be very helpful in the production of knowledge relied upon in the management of flood risks (Porter and Demeritt 2012;Landström and Whatmore 2014).…”
Section: The Case Of Flood Policy Decision-makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation