2021
DOI: 10.3390/w13121612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flood Stage Forecasting Using Machine-Learning Methods: A Case Study on the Parma River (Italy)

Abstract: Real-time river flood forecasting models can be useful for issuing flood alerts and reducing or preventing inundations. To this end, machine-learning (ML) methods are becoming increasingly popular thanks to their low computational requirements and to their reliance on observed data only. This work aimed to evaluate the ML models’ capability of predicting flood stages at a critical gauge station, using mainly upstream stage observations, though downstream levels should also be included to consider backwater, if… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, the 16 models were consistent in predicting 53.79% and 0.11% of the watershed as belonging to the very low and very high flood risk classes, respectively, while inconsistencies were observed for the remaining 46.10%. A total of 11 flood-conditioning factors, including curvature, elevation, distance to river, drainage density, slope, flow accumulation, precipitation, TWI, NDVI, SPI and WI, were selected as numerical variables, while five factors, including aspect, flow direction, geology, substrate resistance to erosion, and land use, were identified as categorical variables in mapping flood susceptibility based on the literature [30,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Models Results Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, the 16 models were consistent in predicting 53.79% and 0.11% of the watershed as belonging to the very low and very high flood risk classes, respectively, while inconsistencies were observed for the remaining 46.10%. A total of 11 flood-conditioning factors, including curvature, elevation, distance to river, drainage density, slope, flow accumulation, precipitation, TWI, NDVI, SPI and WI, were selected as numerical variables, while five factors, including aspect, flow direction, geology, substrate resistance to erosion, and land use, were identified as categorical variables in mapping flood susceptibility based on the literature [30,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Models Results Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include artificial neural network (ANN), which is one of the most widely used ML algorithms for flood risk prediction [21][22][23][24][25][26][27]. Other ML algorithms have been used to predict flood risk such as support vector machine [28][29][30], random forest (RF) [17,31,32], logistic regression [7], adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system [33] and Long Short-term Memory [34,35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weights are calculated by minimizing the mean square error between the output and the actual values. ASCE Task Committee on Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Hydrology (2000) provides a detailed survey of the numerous effective applications of ANNs to hydrological problems, e.g., estimating temperature (Cifuentes et al 2020), and precipitation (Lee et al 2018), modeling stream flows (Uysal et al 2016), forecasting river stages (Dazzi et al 2021), rainfall-runoff modeling (Riad et al 2004), water quality modeling (Rehana & Dhanya 2018;Zhu et al 2018), groundwater modeling (Ebrahimi & Rajaee 2017), and many other applications. More details of the ANN model and the training algorithms can be found in El- Baroudy et al (2010).…”
Section: Artificial Neural Network (Ann)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application of AI to hydrology has largely focused on atmospheric modeling and image segmentation (Ball, Anderson, & Chan, 2017). However, there is a growing body of research using AI for modeling hydrologic variables (Nourani, Baghanam, Adamowski, & Kisi, 2014) such as flow (Alquraish, Abuhasel, Alqahtani, & Khadr, 2021), runoff (Han, Choi, Jung, & Kim, 2021;Kratzert et al, 2019), sediment, and flooding (Dazzi, Vacondio, & Mignosa, 2021;Han et al, 2021;Jiang, Xie, & Sainju, 2019;Schmidt, Heße, Attinger, & Kumar, 2020). Surface water modeling is informed by atmospheric modeling, yet hydrologic feature extraction often employs traditional image segmentation methods using reflectance and elevation data.…”
Section: Hydrographic Feature Extraction and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%