2011
DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2011.608359
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floods and floodplain changes of the River Morava, the Strážnické Pomoraví region (Czech Republic) over the past 130 years

Abstract: The development of the River Morava floodplain has been influenced by several natural and anthropogenic factors. This paper focuses on variations in flood activity and channel changes of the River Morava in the region of Strážnické Pomoraví (southeastern Czech Republic). Floods are analysed in terms of measured peak water stages, H k (Rohatec, 1886(Rohatec, -1920 and peak discharges Q k (Rohatec/Strážnice, 1921 evaluated with respect to their N-year return period (H N or Q N ). The frequency of floods with Q … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
16
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Channel regulation was particularly influential between Napajedla and Rohatec. In the Strážnické Pomoraví region, the natural dynamics of the original anabranching channel patterns of the Morava were significantly modified by human intervention, including the abandonment of some anabranching channels, main channel straightening and enlargement, flood-dike construction, and the creation of a shipping channel for Bat'a Enterprises (Brázdil et al, 2011b). From changes in land use between 1836 and 2006, reflected in the retention capacity of the landscape, it follows that 59.2 % of the entire Morava catchment was once in stable use (mainly forest and arable land).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Channel regulation was particularly influential between Napajedla and Rohatec. In the Strážnické Pomoraví region, the natural dynamics of the original anabranching channel patterns of the Morava were significantly modified by human intervention, including the abandonment of some anabranching channels, main channel straightening and enlargement, flood-dike construction, and the creation of a shipping channel for Bat'a Enterprises (Brázdil et al, 2011b). From changes in land use between 1836 and 2006, reflected in the retention capacity of the landscape, it follows that 59.2 % of the entire Morava catchment was once in stable use (mainly forest and arable land).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, depending on channel capacity, the river need not even inundate the floodplain and do damage. For example, the modern channel of the River Morava in the area of Strážnické Pomoraví has the capacity to carry a discharge equivalent to a 5-year flood Q 5 (Brázdil et al, 2011b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, understanding streambank erosion hazards in response to recent floods calls for analyses of the links between floods and river behaviours at the regional to local scale (Langhammer and Vilímek, 2008;Brázdil et al, 2011). The long-term response to a series of flood events manifests itself first in the inner-channel organisation of landforms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1920s, discharges have reached Q once, Q twice, Q once, Q six times, Q eighteen times, and Q twentyeight times (Figure 3). Among the highest frequencies of oods are decades 1961-1970, with eleven events, and 2001-2010, with seven events [26]. So far the highest peak discharge at Strážnice, a ow of 901 m s − , was recorded on 10 July 1997, during the ' ood of the 20th century' which exceeded the value of Q .…”
Section: Geographical Settingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The study reach is situated on the former dominant anastomosing arm, which has preserved, according to evidence from old maps, its meandering pattern since at least the second half of the eighteenth century. The current spatial pattern of dynamic and stable segments distribution had already been documented by [26] who employed visual analysis of old maps from the second half of the nineteenth century. While the channel migration rates varied signi cantly in that time and were conditioned primarily by river engineering, the spatial pattern was rather persistent.…”
Section: Discussion Planform Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%