2018
DOI: 10.21826/2446-8231201873s65
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flora Lenhosa De Florestas Estacionais Do Estado De Mato Grosso Do Sul: Estado Da Arte

Abstract: RESUMO -Há poucas informações sobre a composição fl orística das fl orestas estacionais em Mato Grosso do Sul. O objetivo deste trabalho foi atualizar o conhecimento sobre a composição fl orística das fl orestas estacionais do MS no Biota-MS. Foram utilizadas coletas de plantas lenhosas dos autores e de outros coletores em Florestas estacionais semidecíduas ou decíduas, ou em áreas de transição, depositadas nos herbários CGMS, COR e DDMS. Acrescentaram-se exemplares depositadas no herbário MBM e em alguns caso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The main continuous areas of Neotropical dry forests are located in northeastern Brazil, with Caatinga vegetation, and in southeastern Bolivia, Paraguay and northeastern Argentina, with typical Chaco vegetation (Valdez-Hernández et al 2010). At the Brazil/Bolivia border, in the residual relief hills on the western border of the Pantanal, deciduous forest remnants present floristic elements similar to northeastern Caatinga, the Chaco and the Chiquitano dry forest of Bolivia (Prado & Gibbs 1993;Damasceno-Junior et al 2018). These fragments are located in a non-flooded area, and therefore serve as a refuge for wild animals and cattle during flood periods in the Pantanal (Salis et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main continuous areas of Neotropical dry forests are located in northeastern Brazil, with Caatinga vegetation, and in southeastern Bolivia, Paraguay and northeastern Argentina, with typical Chaco vegetation (Valdez-Hernández et al 2010). At the Brazil/Bolivia border, in the residual relief hills on the western border of the Pantanal, deciduous forest remnants present floristic elements similar to northeastern Caatinga, the Chaco and the Chiquitano dry forest of Bolivia (Prado & Gibbs 1993;Damasceno-Junior et al 2018). These fragments are located in a non-flooded area, and therefore serve as a refuge for wild animals and cattle during flood periods in the Pantanal (Salis et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the high beta diversity found in deciduous seasonal forests (Linares-Palomino et al 2011), these forests on the western border of the Pantanal are still poorly studied due, in part, to their occurrence in areas of intense anthropogenic disturbance caused by urbanization, livestock, settlements and mining (Salis et al 2004;Damasceno-Junior et al 2018). Only two phenological studies about plant communities have been carried out in the region of the Urucum massif, one in deciduous forest and the other in Cerrado grasslands with ferruginous soil (Ragusa -Netto & Silva 2007;Neves & Damasceno-Junior 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae), popularmente conhecida como Fava-D'anta, por ser muito apreciada pela anta (Tapirus terrestris L.), sendo as sementes comumente encontradas em grande quantidade nas fezes destes animais (Feres et al, 2006). Está amplamente distribuída nas fitofisionomias do Cerrado brasileiro, com registros também na Bolívia e Paraguai (Costa et al, 2018), no Brasil sua ocorrência é descrita principalmente no Css (Costa et al, 2018, Souza & Lovato, 2010), e floresta decidual (FED) (Damasceno et al, 2018). Sendo raros os trabalhos que a descrevem para a FES (Marangon et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…">Atlantic forestThe Atlantic Forest is also a biodiversity hotspot (Myers et al 2000), and the vegetation is not re-prone. The structure of the Atlantic Forest in the state of MS presents physiognomies of semideciduous and deciduous forests (Damasceno-Junior et al 2018). Semideciduous forests can lose 20-50% of leaves during the dry season, while deciduous forests can lose more than 50% (IBGE, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%