2008
DOI: 10.25223/brad.n26.2008.a6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral biology, phytogeography and systematics of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (Cactaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3H). The Copiapó Valley also marks the northernmost distribution of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (Walter, 2008), and in Nolana (Solanaceae) a genus occurring in a similar habitat, the Copiapó Valley, also marks one of the strongest barriers to gene flux (Ossa et al, 2013). These results suggest that the Copiapó Valley acts as a barrier in distinct Cactaceae and other plant lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3H). The Copiapó Valley also marks the northernmost distribution of Eriosyce subgenus Neoporteria (Walter, 2008), and in Nolana (Solanaceae) a genus occurring in a similar habitat, the Copiapó Valley, also marks one of the strongest barriers to gene flux (Ossa et al, 2013). These results suggest that the Copiapó Valley acts as a barrier in distinct Cactaceae and other plant lineages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…form a well‐supported clade in our analyses, a finding that confirms the results of Guerrero & al. () and Walter's assumption () and refutes Kattermann's () broad concept of E. subgibbosa . Only recently, however, he accepted E. subgibbosa subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…vallenarensis and E. subgibbosa subsp. wagenknechtii were placed as sister to the other taxa of clade VI and not with E. subgibbosa (Walter, ; Guerrero & al., ). Finally, E. subgibbosa subsp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con excepción de Donald & Rowley (1966), Neoporteria ha sido considerado como grupo natural por distintos autores, independiente de su rango taxonómico (Walter 2008, Guerrero et al 2011, sin embargo, la propuesta de Kattermann (1994) que incluye a Neoporteria en Eriosyce s.l. como taxón infragenérico no ha sido objetada salvo por Kiesling et al (2008) en donde se mantiene al nivel de género.…”
Section: Neoporteria Britton and Roseunclassified
“…Estudios de diversa índole sugieren la monofilia de Neoporteria s.s. independiente de su rango taxonómico, ya sea sobre la base de caracteres anatómicos del tallo (Nyffeler & Eggli 1997), patrones de floración y morfología floral (Walter 2008) o morfología y análisis filogenéticos moleculares (Guerrero et al 2011). Sin embargo, en todos estos trabajos se discute la inclusión o exclusión de especies intermedias con Pyrrhocactus s.l.…”
Section: Neoporteria Britton and Roseunclassified