2008
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Floral evolution: One-sided evolution or two? A reply to Ennos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a commonly reported axis of specialization; for example, nectar is often secreted at the base of long tubular corollas or spurs (see Hodges and Arnold 1995;Hodges 1997;Muchhala 2006b). Specialization along this axis may result in a coevolutionary spiral or serial pollinator switches, as appears to be the case for the long spurs of some orchid and columbine flowers and their long-tongued pollinators (Darwin 1877;Nilsson et al 1987;Nilsson 1988;Wasserthal 1997;Whittall and Hodges 2007;Ennos 2008;Hodges and Whittall 2008).…”
Section: Divergence In Attraction Systems (Rewards and Advertisements)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This is a commonly reported axis of specialization; for example, nectar is often secreted at the base of long tubular corollas or spurs (see Hodges and Arnold 1995;Hodges 1997;Muchhala 2006b). Specialization along this axis may result in a coevolutionary spiral or serial pollinator switches, as appears to be the case for the long spurs of some orchid and columbine flowers and their long-tongued pollinators (Darwin 1877;Nilsson et al 1987;Nilsson 1988;Wasserthal 1997;Whittall and Hodges 2007;Ennos 2008;Hodges and Whittall 2008).…”
Section: Divergence In Attraction Systems (Rewards and Advertisements)mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In addition, models of the tempo of evolution strongly indicated the concentration of spur-length evolution at times of speciation. Thus, as with the broad correlation between the evolution of spurs themselves and species diversity, this study suggests that spur length is intimately linked with the speciation process, at least in North American species of Aquilegia (38,39). Functionally, matching of spur length to tongue length has been shown to be adaptive because Aquilegia flowers with artificially shortened spurs have less pollen removed from their anthers, and presumably deposited on their stigmas, because of the body of the pollinator being held further away from the flower (40).…”
Section: Evolutionary Trends In Aquilegiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In allogamous orchids, the plants rely on animals for the transportation and deposition of pollen. About four‐fifth of all orchid species are pollinated by animals, mostly insects (Van der Pijl and Dodson , Grimaldi ), although there are various transitions between complete allogamy and some degree of autogamy (Tałałaj and Brzosko , Claessens and Kleynen , Jacquemyn et al ). Pollinators may be attracted by various rewards like pollen, nectar, oil or food‐hairs (Kull et al ), but in European orchids, nectar is the main reward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pollinators may be attracted by various rewards like pollen, nectar, oil or food‐hairs (Kull et al ), but in European orchids, nectar is the main reward. Nectar is a key component in the relationship between plants and pollinators (Lenaerts et al ), and in orchid flowers it can be secreted on the inflorescences (Subedi et al ), sepals (Subedi et al , Karremans et al 2015), lip, lip base or in an elongation of the lip, or the spur (Kocyan et al ). The place where nectar is presented greatly influences the visitor spectrum: an orchid with easily accessible and copious nectar like Neottia ovata (L.) Bluff & Fingerh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%