Fluid Flow and Transport in Rocks 1997
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-1533-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Flow and Transport During Contact Metamorphism and Hydrothermal Activity: Examples from the Oslo Rift

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to the results of Voicu et al (2000), who found that Nd isotope compositions within a gold deposit hosted in granitoid rocks (with surrounding andesites and basalts) reflected the source of the mineralising fluid, while Sr isotopes had become rock buffered. In comparison, Jamtveit et al (1997) found that a skarn hosted in limestones and shales showed significant Sr isotope variation, yet little Nd isotope variation. It is likely that different hydrothermal systems will have different transport characteristics for Sr and Nd, depending on the composition of host rocks, and the composition and complexa-tion of Sr and Nd in the hydrothermal fluid (Gammons et al, 1996;DePaolo and Getty, 1996;DePaolo, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is similar to the results of Voicu et al (2000), who found that Nd isotope compositions within a gold deposit hosted in granitoid rocks (with surrounding andesites and basalts) reflected the source of the mineralising fluid, while Sr isotopes had become rock buffered. In comparison, Jamtveit et al (1997) found that a skarn hosted in limestones and shales showed significant Sr isotope variation, yet little Nd isotope variation. It is likely that different hydrothermal systems will have different transport characteristics for Sr and Nd, depending on the composition of host rocks, and the composition and complexa-tion of Sr and Nd in the hydrothermal fluid (Gammons et al, 1996;DePaolo and Getty, 1996;DePaolo, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The skarn samples have previously been described by Jamtveit et al [1993, 1995, 1997], who focused on the origin of oscillatory zoned grossular‐andradite (grandite) garnets in these rocks and concluded that the most Fe‐rich zones were formed during periods of rapid crystal growth triggered by influx of external fluids from a neighboring intrusion. Petrographic observations indicate that the skarn magnetite is formed simultaneously with the andradite garnets at temperatures and pressures of T = 350–400°C, P = 50–100 MPa [ Jamtveit et al , 1997]. Figure 1a shows a reflected light optical image of a section of a skarn sample dominated by grandite garnets, and millimeter‐sized magnetite grains.…”
Section: Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%